Re: Content-type returned by JSONInterceptor

2011-03-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think JSON rpc was not really well defined at the moment, there was minimal information on some dojo wiki if I remember right. On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, John Lindal wrote: > Cool!  But this raises the issue that Struts2 isn't implementing JSON-RPC 2.0 > correctly: > >  http://groups.goog

Re: Content-type returned by JSONInterceptor

2011-03-03 Thread John Lindal
Cool! But this raises the issue that Struts2 isn't implementing JSON-RPC 2.0 correctly: http://groups.google.com/group/json-rpc/web/json-rpc-2-0 http://groups.google.com/group/json-rpc/web/json-rpc-over-http Specifically, the json plugin doesn't return a jsonrpc element with value "2.0" an

Re: Content-type returned by JSONInterceptor

2011-03-03 Thread Dave Newton
A search for the json-rpc type seems to return a lot of hits. On Thursday, March 3, 2011, John Lindal wrote: > I just noticed that org.apache.struts2.json.JSONUtil.writeJSONToResponse() > sets the Content-type to 'application/json-rpc' for RPC responses.  Is this > really correct?  I know brows

Content-type returned by JSONInterceptor

2011-03-03 Thread John Lindal
I just noticed that org.apache.struts2.json.JSONUtil.writeJSONToResponse() sets the Content-type to 'application/json-rpc' for RPC responses. Is this really correct? I know browsers understand application/json, but do they understand application/json-rpc? Unless anybody objects, I would like

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011-03-03 Thread Paul Benedict
Count me in for backup. If someone gets tied up with day work and you need an extra hand, I will help take over for that person the best I can. On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Dave Newton wrote: > It seems like it might be a good idea for the ASF to have a performant > (how I hate that word) EL,

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011-03-03 Thread Dave Newton
It seems like it might be a good idea for the ASF to have a performant (how I hate that word) EL, possible taking a look at how MVEL/etc. does some things, etc. I kind of like OGNL and the power it provides, just wish it was faster--I'd help with that as time allows. Dave On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011-03-03 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
You're welcome On 3 March 2011 12:47, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2011/3/3 Maurizio Cucchiara : >> Lukasz, >> you can count on me too, feel free to tell me how I can help you (I've >> already subscribed on every apache commons mailing list and incubator >> one too) > > Thanks Maurizio! > > > Regards >

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011-03-03 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2011/3/3 Maurizio Cucchiara : > Lukasz, > you can count on me too, feel free to tell me how I can help you (I've > already subscribed on every apache commons mailing list and incubator > one too) Thanks Maurizio! Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Confitura 2011 http:/

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011-03-03 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Lukasz, you can count on me too, feel free to tell me how I can help you (I've already subscribed on every apache commons mailing list and incubator one too) On 3 March 2011 12:04, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Hi, > > As Antonio suggested, is anybody else interested here in supporting > OGNL and the wh

Re: Road Map for 2.2.2

2011-03-03 Thread John Lindal
WW-3549 sounds very similar to XW-388. Can you check, and close both, if they're duplicates? Thanks, John On 3/2/11 4:05 AM, "Lukasz Lenart" wrote: Hi, I'm going to prepare a new release but before that I want to close the issues below: - WW-3549 Shade common-io from the xwork-core.jar - WW

Fwd: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011-03-03 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, As Antonio suggested, is anybody else interested here in supporting OGNL and the whole incubation process ? There's a discussion going on on the dev@commons mailing list about that. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl --