Stupid bits.
On Dec 28, 2011 12:29 PM, "Martin Cooper" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Dave Newton
> wrote:
> > How should I vote if I can't run the tests at the moment, but I can
> review
> > the source changes?
>
> Given that the vote is on the actual bits, consider this. Suppose tha
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> How should I vote if I can't run the tests at the moment, but I can review
> the source changes?
Given that the vote is on the actual bits, consider this. Suppose that
somehow Lukasz's build process got completely messed up, and the zip
file d
How should I vote if I can't run the tests at the moment, but I can review
the source changes?
So confused. Hmm, maybe I can run tests after all--I'll try tonight.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> Thanks for offering your help. If you feel like being able to test the
> bina
Thanks for offering your help. If you feel like being able to test the
binary distribution announced here and to give feedback, that is
qualification enough :) We highly appreciate every casted vote.
For details on the voting process and the difference between binding and
non-binding votes, please
