Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2012/1/2 Dave Newton : > Minor formatting tweaks made; the one about creating/overwriting files left > me a bit confused. I understand the issue (more or less) but was having a > problem parsing the paragraph--I have not modified it at this point. Thanks Dave, I'm planning to prepare unit tests th

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Johannes Geppert
Now it works. Thanks Johannes Łukasz Lenart wrote > > Try now > - web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Struts-2-3-1-1-Vote-fast-track-tp5101449p5115468.html Sent from the Struts - Dev ma

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Dave Newton
Minor formatting tweaks made; the one about creating/overwriting files left me a bit confused. I understand the issue (more or less) but was having a problem parsing the paragraph--I have not modified it at this point. d. 2012/1/2 Łukasz Lenart > Try now > > 2012/1/2 Johannes Geppert : > > I ca

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Łukasz Lenart
Try now 2012/1/2 Johannes Geppert : > I can't see this Security Bulletin. > > /You cannot view this page > > Page level restrictions have been applied that limit access to this page./ > > Johannes > > > - > web: http://www.jgeppert.com > twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep > -- > View this messa

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Johannes Geppert
I can't see this Security Bulletin. /You cannot view this page Page level restrictions have been applied that limit access to this page./ Johannes - web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Str

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Łukasz Lenart
Hi, I've prepared a Security Bulletin [1] regarding 2.3.1.1 (restricted to struts-committers), please check [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-008 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ -

Jenkins build is back to normal : Struts2 #402

2012-01-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2012/1/2 Maurizio Cucchiara : >> [ X] General Availability (GA) Vote passed: 3x +1 (binding) > > Just a little question: why don't we include the address of the maven > staging repository in the vote process? > Many lazy users (like me) just want  to change only the struts version > inside their

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.1.1 Vote (fast track)

2012-01-02 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
> [ X] General Availability (GA) Just a little question: why don't we include the address of the maven staging repository in the vote process? Many lazy users (like me) just want to change only the struts version inside their pom, for instance : 2.3.1.1 I don't know if it is the right way, but I