2012/11/22 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org:
2012/11/22 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com:
How useful is the Struts 1 plugin?
It's mentioned as a migration way for S1 projects, but we can drop
support for S1 in S3
Any thoughts? I'm almost sure that we should drop support for S1 in S3
I have no problem with that. (Obviously ;)
IMO the S1 plugin was never anything more than a stopgap measure;
since JSPs had to be rewritten anyway it was more of a temporary
solution during migration.
Dave
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
2012/11/22
2012/11/25 Johannes Geppert jo...@apache.org:
What others think about shrinking a little bit the menu and some Content?
+1 :-)
1.) The Roadmap FAQ is really outdated!
We can update it, delete it or reference it to the current Struts3 Wiki Page
I think we can remove that page, even if we plan
How hard would it be to allow for struts run time configuration? In
allowing for I mean having a registry for the configuration of interceptor
stacks, packages, actions... which the framework will allow for querying
and in the default case would be immutable but would allow us to substitute
in
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.orgwrote:
2012/11/25 Johannes Geppert jo...@apache.org:
What others think about shrinking a little bit the menu and some Content?
+1 :-)
Depends on what you mean by shrink. We have people (e.g. Link, very
recently) who
@Christian
The Footer must be inside of an Element, like this:
footerp#169; 2005-2011 The Apache Software Foundation - Apache Struts,
Struts, Apache, the Apache feather logo, and the Apache Struts project
logos are trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation./p/footer
But when I try this, I
2012/11/26 Ken McWilliams ken.mcwilli...@gmail.com:
How hard would it be to allow for struts run time configuration? In
allowing for I mean having a registry for the configuration of interceptor
stacks, packages, actions... which the framework will allow for querying
and in the default case
2012/11/26 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com:
I have no problem with that. (Obviously ;)
IMO the S1 plugin was never anything more than a stopgap measure;
since JSPs had to be rewritten anyway it was more of a temporary
solution during migration.
Really? I thought you can run S1 application
Lukasz, you can... but the S1 plugin allows people to forgo the S1 jar. You
don't gain much in terms of the presentation layer since you can't use the
S1 taglibs anymore, but the S1 action can still be called.
Paul
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.orgwrote:
