Re: Struts annotations limited to specific methods

2013-06-28 Thread Paul Benedict
I am glad you're familiar with validation groups -- because that's exactly what I was alluding to. I see the Struts 2 documentation allows me to target validation on a particular method through XML only; Struts 2 simply lacks the annotation counterpart. If today I have to use XML, okay, but just wa

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts2-JDK6 #741

2013-06-28 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [Lukasz Lenart] WW-4130 Adds usage of SiteExporter instead of wget to export docs from Confluence -- [...truncated 8817 lines...] [INFO] Webapps

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts2-JDK6 » Struts 2 Assembly #741

2013-06-28 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [Lukasz Lenart] WW-4130 Adds usage of SiteExporter instead of wget to export docs from Confluence -- [INFO]

Re: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.

2013-06-28 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/6/28 Rene Gielen : > Will hopefully being able to check tomorrow I resolved that - wrong path in docs.cfg file ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@str

Re: Struts annotations limited to specific methods

2013-06-28 Thread Umesh Awasthi
I worked quite a bit on JSR 303 validations (Both with Hibernate Validation as well Apache Bval) and also worked on creating plugin to integrate it with Struts2, since with version 2.5/3.0 , we are looking to have some major changes so was wondering if i should wait for Struts 2.5/ 3.0. On Fri,

Re: Struts annotations limited to specific methods

2013-06-28 Thread Rene Gielen
This sounds a bit like "inversion of control". As for me, I'd rather not like to have my model (which is to validate) to have knowledge about the business side validation is triggered from. When I develop from the action perpective, I know if the current method is better off triggering validation o

Re: Struts annotations limited to specific methods

2013-06-28 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Hi Paul, actually there is one way: using @SkipValidation combined with @Validation Or maybe I miss the point. Is there something better in your approach? On 28 June 2013 05:38, Paul Benedict wrote: > I was thinking it would be a good idea to add "String[] actions" on the > validations. When emp