Github user lukaszlenart commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/35#issuecomment-78426250
But you cannot pass `null` and expect that it will work properly, if you
want such behaviour add method with signature that doesn't expect `ValueStack`
---
If your p
Github user quaff commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/35#issuecomment-78400068
It's just a static util class, It should be light and simple, your
suggestion is opposite.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user lukaszlenart commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/35#issuecomment-78242017
So you can use a `StubValueContext` like this one
```java
public class StubValueStack implements ValueStack {
Map ctx = new HashMap();
CompoundR
