Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-examples-JDK7-master #15

See Changes: [jogep] Use relative URL's to views -- [...truncated 15 lines...] Fetching upstream changes from http://git.apache.org/struts-examples.git > git -c core.askpass=true fetch

Jenkins build is back to normal : Struts-JDK7-pull-request #77

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK7-pull-request #76

See Changes: [jasper_rosenberg] Make it easier to extend to use own ActionInvocation -- [...truncated 38 lines...] [locks-and-latches] Checking to see if we really have the locks [locks-an

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

Woops! Just noticed that I have created the branch based on "master" but I should use some of the STRUTS_2_3_x tags, will do it right now. 2015-10-09 17:58 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > I meant the "support-2-3" branch ;-) > > 2015-10-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : >> Hi, >> >> I am going to spe

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

I meant the "support-2-3" branch ;-) 2015-10-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > Hi, > > I am going to spend some time on preparing a new 2.3.x release, there > is already few issues registered. All the work will be performed in > the "struts-2-3" branch. I am also wondering if I should merge the

Struts 2.3.x - a new release

Hi, I am going to spend some time on preparing a new 2.3.x release, there is already few issues registered. All the work will be performed in the "struts-2-3" branch. I am also wondering if I should merge the changes with Strict Method Invocation into to that branch? https://issues.apache.org/jir

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK8-master #43

See Changes: [andrea.ligios] Changing an erroneous variable's name [andrea.ligios] Added support for RFC3339 with date part only [cnenning] added tests for rfc3339 date formats -- [...truncate

[GitHub] struts pull request: Make it easier to extend to use own ActionInv...

Github user perfnorm commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/54#issuecomment-146841479 Done, thanks @wolpi (also added for my other pull request) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well

[GitHub] struts pull request: Make it easier to extend to use own ActionInv...

Github user wolpi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/54#issuecomment-146840650 Please create a JIRA issue. That makes it easier to track changes and contributions. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW --- If your project is set up for it

[GitHub] struts pull request: Make it easier to extend to override intercep...

GitHub user perfnorm opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/55 Make it easier to extend to override interceptor stack Just as createAction is split out from init, it would be great to split out creating the interceptor iterator creation so it can be overridden

[GitHub] struts pull request: Make it easier to extend to use own ActionInv...

GitHub user perfnorm opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/54 Make it easier to extend to use own ActionInvocation I needed to extend DefaultActionProxyFactory to return my own ActionInvocation, but I had to override all of createActionProxy() to do so. Seem

[GitHub] struts pull request: Adding support for RFC3339 dates with only th...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/52 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl