śr., 19 wrz 2018 o 13:42 Yasser Zamani napisał(a):
> Yes I saw :) thanks a lot keeping this one to be done! By the way I'm
> trying to build 2.3.x with latest struts-master or etc to see if is
> possible to automate WW-4951.
Don't bother, it isn't :(
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://w
On 9/19/2018 2:23 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Ah, right :) I knew that I saw this idea somewhere but I couldn't
> recall.
Yes I saw :) thanks a lot keeping this one to be done! By the way I'm
trying to build 2.3.x with latest struts-master or etc to see if is
possible to automate WW-4951.
Regard
śr., 19 wrz 2018 o 12:08 Yasser Zamani napisał(a):
> -1 as I think this will be error prone and hard to do as a manual
> procedure (ASF says "For every artifact distributed to the public
> through Apache channels" [1] i.e. not only assemblies but also all
> artifacts). I would automate it; as mave
On 9/19/2018 2:17 PM, Yasser Zamani wrote:
> Same refactor would be nice for Struts internal CDI by
> finding all references of @Inject and refactoring them [1]. This changes
> isn't backward compatible so no need for deprecation I think.
FIX: This change (finding all references of @Inject and r
śr., 19 wrz 2018 o 11:41 Yasser Zamani napisał(a):
> On 9/19/2018 10:33 AM, christoph.nenn...@bmw.de wrote:
> > Oh yes, that sounds like a great idea!
> > I wonder why we didn't come up with this earlier, the simplest ideas are
> > the hardest to find ;)
>
> We already have discovered and propose
On 9/19/2018 10:53 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Cool, first step https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/252 - WIP :)
+1, thanks a lot! Same refactor would be nice for Struts internal CDI by
finding all references of @Inject and refactoring them [1]. This changes
isn't backward compatible so no need
On 9/19/2018 8:23 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Yeah... the sums in Nexus are generated by Nexus, there is an issue
> about generating sums in Nexus 3 - looks like it's a matter of policy
> defined in Nexus what kind of sums to generate. I would not batter
> with this. Anyway, we must provide SHA256
On 9/19/2018 10:33 AM, christoph.nenn...@bmw.de wrote:
> Oh yes, that sounds like a great idea!
> I wonder why we didn't come up with this earlier, the simplest ideas are the
> hardest to find ;)
We already have discovered and proposed this in security list [1] about
one year ago :)
LGTM also
śr., 19 wrz 2018 o 09:03 napisał(a):
>
> Oh yes, that sounds like a great idea!
> I wonder why we didn't come up with this earlier, the simplest ideas are the
> hardest to find ;)
>
> My preference would be the name withSession.
Cool, first step https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/252 - WIP :)
Oh yes, that sounds like a great idea!
I wonder why we didn't come up with this earlier, the simplest ideas are the
hardest to find ;)
My preference would be the name withSession.
Regards,
Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org]
Gesend
10 matches
Mail list logo
