Re: lazy consensus state for PR#483,496

2021-07-24 Thread i...@flyingfischer.ch
I did take a look at https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/483 https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/496 This seems to me too big of a change for the current 2.5 branch. It should be reconsidered or reevaluated eventually for an upcoming 2.6 branch. It also seems sensible to me to have a user-

Re: lazy consensus state for PR#483,496

2021-07-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
pt., 23 lip 2021 o 17:56 Yasser Zamani napisaƂ(a): > > Hi, > > Thanks , comments on 483 addressed and corresponding 496 created by > cherry pick and manual merge. > > I will merge these PRs (483 and 496) in 72 hours based on ASF lazy > consensus definition [1] unless someone objects. I'm against