> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20. august 2006 00:36
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: JIRA - Closing Releases
>
> I am pleased to announce that Struts 0.5 in JIRA has been
> released :) hehe. Everything looks good! I will release the
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19. august 2006 23:06
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [s2] jira is down
>
> Does releasing in JIRA actually send out emails for all the
> bugs attached to it???
No, it does not.
\Anders
-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: 19. august 2006 22:03
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [s2] jira is down
>
> On 8/19/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Before you do this, we probably need to
+1 GA non-binding. Been using 1.3.5 successfully in my app.
\Anders
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: 11. august 2006 15:07
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
>
> On 8
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: 25. juli 2006 00:45
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.0 - Tag it and Roll it?
>
> On 7/24/06, Anders Steinlein <[EMAIL PROTECT
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: 24. juli 2006 21:53
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.0 - Tag it and Roll it?
>
> -1 on changing the versioning scheme.
>
> But, I would be open to someth
> -Original Message-
> From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30. juni 2006 22:31
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Struts JIRA Roadmap
>
> On 6/30/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I should have seen the next 3 versions thing. I guess my
> questi
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:22:09 +0200, Anders Steinlein
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0
> > as well. As I would
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:22:09 +0200, Anders Steinlein
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0
> > as well. As I would
>
> > 3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs
>
> I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0
Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0 as well. As I
would anticipate 1-2 years in development on Struts 2.x, J2SE 5.0 should
be widely deployed by then. If not, then our "endorsement" of it could
encourage peo
>
> > 3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs
>
> I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0
Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0 as well. As I
would anticipate 1-2 years in development on Struts 2.x, J2SE 5.0 should
be widely deployed by then. If not, then our "endorsement" of it could
encourage peo
I have to agree with Craig here. Although I haven't used JSF that much
yet, I have investigated it enough to understand its basic infrastructure
and functionality. As Craig said, it would require much work to abstract
the same functionality in to Struts, where it is already available in JSF
(such a
I have to agree with Craig here. Although I haven't used JSF that much
yet, I have investigated it enough to understand its basic infrastructure
and functionality. As Craig said, it would require much work to abstract
the same functionality in to Struts, where it is already available in JSF
(such a
Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases?
I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers
are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA. But,
what goes into a release? Does new features/enhancements go into a 1.2.x
releas
Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases?
I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers
are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA. But,
what goes into a release? Does new features/enhancements go into a 1.2.x
releas
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13. oktober 2004 16:13
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Roadmap
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter wrote:
> > I think we need to define a feature common denominator table of
> > what c
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13. oktober 2004 16:13
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Roadmap
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter wrote:
> > I think we need to define a feature common denominator table of
> > what c
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 19:29:51 +0200, Anders Steinlein wrote:
> >Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What
> >about pushing
> >it out to the wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some
> >wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't mind.
>
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 19:29:51 +0200, Anders Steinlein wrote:
> >Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What
> >about pushing
> >it out to the wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some
> >wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't mind.
>
Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What about pushing it out to the
wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't
mind.
\Anders
> -Original Message-
> From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2. september 2004 21:33
Wow, didn't know about that one - quite interesting. What about pushing it out to the
wiki? I can probably do it (and learn some wiki stuff) if Ted or anyone else doesn't
mind.
\Anders
> -Original Message-
> From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2. september 2004 21:33
> > It's more than a thought ... I was about three keystrokes from
> > including this in my proposal to be forward looking on
> servlet 2.4 and
> > JSP 2.0 :-).
> >
>
> I'd love to see Servlet2.4 and JSP2.0 be the minimum.
>
> It was mentioned before that several of the 'itches' that the
>
> > It's more than a thought ... I was about three keystrokes from
> > including this in my proposal to be forward looking on
> servlet 2.4 and
> > JSP 2.0 :-).
> >
>
> I'd love to see Servlet2.4 and JSP2.0 be the minimum.
>
> It was mentioned before that several of the 'itches' that the
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
