., 7 wrz 2025 o 09:56 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>>
>> czw., 4 wrz 2025 o 14:42 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
>>>
>>> Wondering if most are like me and can't test it out due to version
>>> conflicts? Can't wait to vote once you get it working on 2025.X
&g
Wondering if most are like me and can't test it out due to version
conflicts? Can't wait to vote once you get it working on 2025.X
(although I'm not binding)
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 9/4/2025 6:43:54 AM
Subject Re: [VOTE] Struts
Lukasz,
Thanks for all your hardwork on this. I would love to test it out, but
I am now on version 2025.2 of IntelliJ. Are you planning on upgrading
the plugin at some point to work with the 2025.X series?
Thanks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Dev
+1 GA non-binding
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 2/24/2025 6:14:25 AM
Subject [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3
The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first
patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the follow
Thanks Lukasz!
Quick question: With v7.0.3, what is the current status of the Multipart
upload logic?
These 2 release comments are somewhat conflicting:
6.7: WW-5528 Ensure multipart upload illegal characters reported as
error by @kusalk in #1215
WW-5501 Reverts all changes related to WW-550
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025, 10:05 AM Burton Rhodes wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Greg.
>>
>> IMHO, character validation should be left to the developer which depends
>> on their OS and file names supported therein. But if there needs to be
>> protection against
I agree with Greg.
IMHO, character validation should be left to the developer which depends
on their OS and file names supported therein. But if there needs to be
protection against a buffer overflow attack (I assume that is the
problem you are trying to solve?), then the length restriction sh
The new default "EXCLUDED_FILE_PATTERN" is too restrictive for our
application. For example, we consider files with "&" valid. That said,
are we able to override the excluded file pattern in some way (e.g.
struts properties)?
private static final String EXCLUDED_FILE_PATTERN =
"^(.*[<>&\"'|;
[x] GA
Thanks,
Burton
> On Dec 16, 2024, at 10:40 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> The Apache Struts 7.0.0 test build is available. This is the first and
> major release of Struts 7.x series which uses Java 17 and JakartaEE.
> With this release the following issues were addressed:
>
> Internal
e.org/content/groups/staging/
On 12/12/2024 12:30, Burton Rhodes wrote:
It appears that 7.0.0-M10 is no longer available in Maven Central. Should I be
pointing to a different version? The latest versions I see in the repository
are: 6.7.0 and 7.0.0-M9
org.apache.struts
struts2-core
7.0.0-
It appears that 7.0.0-M10 is no longer available in Maven Central.
Should I be pointing to a different version? The latest versions I see
in the repository are: 6.7.0 and 7.0.0-M9
org.apache.struts
struts2-core
7.0.0-M10
Thanks,
Burton
Thanks Lukasz,
M10 seems to be working well in our environment. Thanks for all your hard work
on this.
FYI, I didn't see any mention of the package name refactoring in the migration guide.
Although it will become immediately obvious when building, it might be good to include
for completeness.
Did you remove your "/.m2/repository" directory and rebuild? Sometimes
that does the trick if you think it's a jar issue with maven.
-- Original Message --
From "Greg Huber"
To dev@struts.apache.org
Date 10/31/2024 9:45:58 AM
Subject Re: error response on missing allowed-methods in
Works perfectly. Thanks!
-- Original Message --
From "Łukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 10/20/2024 9:48:10 AM
Subject Re: Struts2 7.0.0-M9 repository location moved?
Try now
niedz., 20 paź 2024 o 16:29 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
Ok - we use
Developers List"
Date 10/20/2024 9:27:05 AM
Subject Re: Struts2 7.0.0-M9 repository location moved?
niedz., 20 paź 2024 o 16:06 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
It appears the Struts 2 7.0.0-M9 release has been removed from the
Apache staging repository. Was this on purpose? And if so, is
It appears the Struts 2 7.0.0-M9 release has been removed from the
Apache staging repository. Was this on purpose? And if so, is there
another url I should be fetching it from?
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/struts/struts2-core/
Thanks,
Burton
I would argue for changing the name to "attributes" since v7 introduces
breaking changes already, and this will avoid confusion moving forward.
Your PR seems to work fine in my test environment (provided I changed
some of my overridden .ftl files).
Just FYI, building the latest snapshot (PR 1
No objections here.
Thanks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 9/2/2024 2:20:28 AM
Subject Struts 7 release plan
Hi,
I would like to release Struts 7 soon (there are a few outstanding
issues I would like to address first) and switch
: IDEA plugin 2024.4
niedz., 14 lip 2024 o 17:08 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
Thanks Lukasz -
THe package installed fine, but when I attempt to apply the Struts
Framework to a module (in Project Structure), I am unable to add any
filesets - no files appear in the list. I've included a scree
Thanks Lukasz -
THe package installed fine, but when I attempt to apply the Struts
Framework to a module (in Project Structure), I am unable to add any
filesets - no files appear in the list. I've included a screenshot that
hopefully you can view.
-- Original Message --
From "Lukas
I'm not sure if this is unique to M8, but I just turned on devMode and
loading a single page in my app floods the console with these entries.
I'm sure the log entries are correct, but they aren't helpful. For
example, shouldn't it tell me which classes or packages or what JSP
call/variable is
I am having the same issue because many of our JSPs access Hibernate
proxy objects. However, setting [struts.disallowProxyMemberAccess=false]
is not working for me. I am still receiving "Access to proxy is
blocked!" errors. Correcting this issue properly (by changing our JSPs)
will take signif
e work being done here,
> don't get me wrong.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Burton Rhodes
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 12:07 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Struts2 7.x official release
>
> [You don't often get ema
To add to Greg‘s comment, we are using M6 and production without issue. Your
mileage may vary though.
> On May 17, 2024, at 11:00 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>
> I am not sure there is a date, but M6 is quite good and stable.
>
>> On 17/05/2024 10:55, Sai Charan Teja Pratti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
It should be
7.0.0-M6
-- Original Message --
From "Greg Huber"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 4/20/2024 5:11:19 AM
Subject Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0-M6 test build is read
What would be the pom fix value we need to use?
7.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT
org.apache.struts
struts2-velocit
Thanks for the update. Your work is much appreciated.
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 4/7/2024 1:04:08 AM
Subject Re: Struts 7.0 Update?
pt., 5 kwi 2024 o 15:04 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
Lukasz,
I just thought
Lukasz,
I just thought I would check in to see how the S2 7.0.0 update was
coming along. There was a lot of activity there for awhile, but things
have been pretty quiet lately. Anything I can help with? FWIW, I have
been running 7.0.0-M3 in production without issue for the past few
weeks.
If I'm not mistaken, M3 represents the 3rd version of "one" major
initiative which includes 2 main refactors: 1) the migration from javax
-> jakarta packaging and 2) upgrading to use Java JDK 17+.
If you want to see all the issues related to the Struts 7.0.0 release,
you can view them here
h
ileUploadInterceptor: Could not find a Content-Type for upload.
Verify that a valid file was submitted.
-- Original Message --
From "Burton Rhodes"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 2/9/2024 9:43:18 AM
Subject Re: [7.0.0-M3] Error message
Also, I am finding quite a
ing
generated in my error logs.
-- Original Message --
From "Burton Rhodes"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 2/9/2024 9:38:12 AM
Subject Re: [7.0.0-M3] Error message
The easiest example is when a custom "saveDir" is not accessible. (e.g
2/9/2024 9:34:36 AM
Subject Re: [7.0.0-M3] Error message
pt., 9 lut 2024 o 16:21 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
I haven't had time yet, but I will try this weekend.
Could you share a use case when it can happen?
Cheers
Lukasz
--
the weekend
pon., 5 lut 2024 o 16:51 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
When catching a FileUploadException in the
AbstractMultiPartRequest.parse() method, if the final "else" is reached,
the default message
"struts.messages.upload.error.FileUploadException=Error uploading: {0}!"
I can build and install the struts code base [struts2-parent] when
skipping tests; however, I am unable to run any test due to a test build
error. I get "package freemarker.core does not exist" in several
classes containing "import freemarker.core.*" within the [struts2-core]
package. Any tip
When catching a FileUploadException in the
AbstractMultiPartRequest.parse() method, if the final "else" is reached,
the default message
"struts.messages.upload.error.FileUploadException=Error uploading: {0}!"
(struts-messages.properties) always displays the "{0}" instead of
replacing it with t
Lukasz,
Just circling back on this. Is the M2 build ready to be tested now?
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 2/1/2024 9:10:02 AM
Subject Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0-M2 test build is ready
There is one issue I need to address - assembl
FWIW, the non-streaming parser works just fine for my applications
needs.
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 1/27/2024 2:07:09 AM
Subject Re: [7.0.0-M1] Actions not setting parameters with Multi-part
forms
I'm still working on this but b
"Struts Developers List"
Date 1/23/2024 10:32:19 AM
Subject Re: [7.0.0-M1] Actions not setting parameters with Multi-part
forms
wt., 23 sty 2024 o 15:23 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
A bit more testing reveals a few clues/issues:
If I switch the parser to "jakarta" (i
the *.tmp extension breaks functionality
in my application (although it's fairly trivial to fix on my end) so my
vote would be to keep the original file extension - but perhaps this is
a security issue?
Thanks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Burton Rhodes"
To "
The biggest issue I'm having at the moment is with all of my multi-part
forms that include parameter data and a file. The action does receive
the file, but the parameter "team.company" is set to the String value of
stream, for example:
"org.apache.commons.fileupload2.core.MultipartInput$ItemInpu
Lukasz -
Great work on this and all the others involved!
I am just testing this out already have a few issues/questions. Is this
the best place to voice those? Or another mailing list?
Thanks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 1
40 matches
Mail list logo
