> Personally, I don't plan to write a set of custom tags for
> Struts 2.0. I would expect Struts 2.0 to be written in such a
> way that custom tags (or Velocity tools) are not needed. But
> if they were needed, and someone wrote a set that was popular
> within our community, then I would consid
Thanks. A separate jar is no biggie, a separate distro is.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Bubna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 4:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: PATCH: html:cancel tag. Made a javascript version for
submitt ing
Edgar P
nions with patches and with participation
on the dev list (Which is how it should work IMHO).
Just hoping ot help out and make my opinions heard, right or wrong.
>From: Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: &
I understand your point, although I don't know why you think it is
important. I guess I just disagree.
Sorry to have made the posting.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: P
> Speak for yourself, I use Struts-EL and JSTL quite happily. One day I
> would like to generate XML for the "view" and use XSLT to transform it
> into HTML to which a CSS is applied, but I don't yet know how.
There are already solutions for this although this seems like a problem
waiting to happ
Since there are no statistics on this I will take a guess that the majority
of struts implementations use the tags. It is just too easy to get going
with the basics. People who use other view technologies with struts are
more advanced and can write what they need anyway. If you split this up the
So you would have to view be disconnected, and therefore when changes occur
in the business objects have only testing and a human mind connect the two
? Considering the poor shape of open source view level testing tools
this argument seems to be resting on shaky grounds.
Edgar
-Original
> This contradicts point 1. If using JSTL tags is a waste of time, so is
> using Struts tags.
Absolutely not. There is no logic in the view layer of the struts tags.
JSTL assumes you have to put the object in the scope, know something about
it in order to traverse it etc.
> If you want your s
I know I will get ignored or flamed on this, but here I go. My apologies in
advance if I offend anyone.
Before I start, I have made more than a couple of attempts at contributing
code, all of which have been ignored or pushed off to irrelevant projects.
I do wish this philosophy would get rethou
Absolutely it should be integrated assuming the struts contributors agree.
Struts is XP and open source and strutstestcase fits right in.
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Deryl Seale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 1:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Integ
Outside of book authors and 'bleeding edgers' who would use JSF (much less
struts-faces) w/o real design tools?
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Lesaint Sébastien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:28 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: [bug?] tag an
OK then, now I understand. I was just so opposed to the idea of validator
in struts, I overlooked it's potential usefulness in the business layer.
Thanks.
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:29 AM
> To: Struts Developer
t: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:00 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Validator Design Questions
>
>
> What does "currently constituted" mean?
>
> David
>
> --- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I for one would never use struts
Then I misunderstood. My apologies.
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 5:43 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Validator Design Questions
>
>
> I'm not understanding your objection. I was suggesting that
> Struts n
I for one would never use struts validator as it is currently constituted
and to be required to use it would cause me to drop using struts. Please
rethink this idea.
Thanks
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 12:46 PM
> To:
The checkbox is not returned as a parameter. You are using session based
actionforms which only update fields for which parameters are returned.
Either use request based parameters or use the 'reset' method to clear your
checkbox fields.
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Chitta Ranjan M
Look at the source code of the bean message tag and extract the code to
perform the lookup to the internationalized messages in your own tag.
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 8:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
This is really a user list question, however, the only issue is in
validation and form redisplay. HTML doesn't have an 'integer' field so
users can enter non-integers. When the non-integers are assigned to your
integer fields, the bad values will be discarded. When the form is
redisplayed, the u
18 matches
Mail list logo
