Re: Struts 2.0.3 status

2007-01-17 Thread Erik Bertelsen
ple.apache.org... 140.211.11.9 Connecting to people.apache.org[140.211.11.9]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden On 1/17/07, Erik Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.3/ seems to be created > and populated,

Re: Struts 2.0.3 status

2007-01-17 Thread Erik Bertelsen
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/m2-staging-repository The http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.3/ seems to be created and populated, but is not accessible from the web. - Erik - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease136" by Paul Benedict

2007-01-13 Thread Erik Bertelsen
- || A4. || Upload distributions to people.apache.org:/www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/v1.3.x || || + || A4. || Upload distributions to people.apache.org:/www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/v1.3.x || (./) || The files are there, but they are not readable from the web -- retrieval attempt

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Erik Bertelsen
Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [ x ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. - Erik

Re: Whose log is this anyway? (was Re: [s1] Commons-Lang)

2006-08-23 Thread Erik Bertelsen
2006/8/22, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As long as the log output and log configuration for my end application is unified - so Struts output and Commons component output go to the same place - then I'm OK with using something other than Commons Logging, if we have to. Dear all, this

Re: Request to publish Struts 1.3.5

2006-06-06 Thread Erik Bertelsen
2006/6/6, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 6/3/06, Erik Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have tweaked my build scripts a little and now successfully upgraded a > handfull of Struts Action applications from 1.3.0 to 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT / > (appears to be built on 29

Re: Request to publish Struts 1.3.5

2006-06-03 Thread Erik Bertelsen
May 2006). Seems to work well and as the distribution's contents has changed since 1.3.0 (and also since 1.2.9), I'd also like to see this be forwarded as a release in the near future. - Erik Bertelsen

Re: [action2] [VOTE] Target Java 5, support 1.4 through Retroweaver

2006-04-25 Thread Erik Bertelsen
> -- > [ ] +1 Make Java 5 the target > ' +1 - Erik

Re: [Beer...maybe] IMPORTANT NEWS FOR ALL STRUTS USERS AND DEVS

2006-04-01 Thread Erik Bertelsen
2006/4/1, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * Frank Zammetti writes a post that is less than 10,000 words long, says > nothing controversial in it, agrees with everyone about everything, > doesn't piss off a PMC member in the process and allows a conversation > to die after just 3 posts in