Can someone please unsubscribe me from the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
emails. I've tried to:
1) Use the link at the bottom of the email to unsubscribe, but
confluence has no record of this e-mail when I try to retrieve my
username so I can't seem to unsbuscribe from there.
2) I tried to use the administr
Is there anyone that can figure out how to remove me from all wiki updated
emails? I've logged in with my username and password and have nothing set to
receive updates, yet I still received them all. Any help greatly
appreciated.
On 8/7/06, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
I think it's a bit confusing (especially to a new user) to not have
the links to the Struts tags also listed on the Struts Action
framework page http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/index.html. I
think many will have this site bookmarked for working with Struts
Action stuff and wonder how to find
as convinced BeanUtils handled this, since it uses the
> standard property descriptors for a bean to get the read method - which it
> then invokes to get the property value.
>
> Niall
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
Are there any plans to allow boolean ActionForm bean properties to
work correctly with the isSomeProperty vs having to use
getSomeProperty? Unless I'm crazy, it seems that the property of an
html:form element has to evaluate getSomeProperty in the ActionForm in
order to work correctly. (isWhatever
On 1/23/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You think? Can anyone even describe use cases where it's valuable to
> have some cancel process happen?
Typically my cancel is just a forward to some other page, but
sometimes I might need to prep a Request before returning to a
previous page
On 1/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, all they need to do is remove the positive branch there, move is to
> wasCancelled(), and remove the rest of the if block.
>
> Anyone else see that as a reasonable solution? Is there a flaw in it I'm
> missing?
Ha, I was typing that
On 1/23/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 3:37 PM -0500 1/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> The proposed solution requires that the person intentionally using
> this feature make one further indication in the struts-config file,
> reinforcing the logical contract that says "it is ok
On 1/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still not sure I see how this suggestion solves the problem... but,
> since three people seem to think it will at this point, I have to assume
> I'm just being dense... It happens from time to time ;) Can you walk me
> (and I assume Pa
On 1/23/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To be honest, I've never really picked up on the use case for the
> "cancel" functionality. Is this something that a lot of people use?
Not sure how many people use it. I never use it either. As I mentioned
way back, I just use a regular di
Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 3/9/2005 11:54 AM:
Take a peek at Bigzilla ticket #33935. Your wish is my command! :)
Is that the chain of command pattern you are granting me or just simply
an order like my wife gives me?
Yes, I saw after I posted the message that you addressed this. Ni
Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 3/8/2005 4:39 PM:
The next step is to add this same functionality to the forward children of
the action mappings. The idea there is that you may have setup tasks you
only want to perform based on which forward is returned by your Action.
The above would rea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 2/4/2005 9:59 PM:
I've written a small test application with it too.
Do you have a demo app somewhere that I could look at or something
explaining in a more practical example of how it works? Thanks.
My only fear with these kind of proposed implementatio
I posted this problem on the Struts list so sorry for the cross post
now, but I'm curious if any of you have some thoughts on what the
problem below could be:
When I deploy any of the sample Struts 1.2.4 apps that use the
validation-rules.xml JBoss complains. However, if I comment out all the
Michael McGrady wrote the following on 9/20/2004 7:52 PM:
> I have a real concern that Struts is going to continue to be bloated
> with what are not Struts, not part of the framework, but what are
> instead really very useful uses of Struts. DispatchAction and its
> progeny are just one example of
Mike Kienenberger wrote the following on 9/17/2004 7:13 PM:
On the other hand, if you're just saying that you can encode your reflection
dispatch name so that "/page&method=X" becomes "/a1b2c3d4e5.psc", you've
just made the security more obscure. If someone figures out your encoding,
they can s
Mike Kienenberger wrote the following on 9/17/2004 2:17 PM:
Any time you allow an end user an opportunity to specify a parameter for
reflection, you're introducing security concerns.
However, a "secure" version could be created by only allowing a dispatch to
a hardcoded list of methods.
But your
Martin Cooper wrote the following on 9/16/2004 10:59 PM:
IMHO, dispatch actions, whatever flavour, are a bad idea in the first
place. They are essentially second-level controllers. What for?
I'm still not totally convinced DispatchActions don't have their place
for handling CRUD stuff. Do you cr
Mike Kienenberger wrote the following on 9/17/2004 2:17 PM:
Not relevent to my situation. We require a WebObjects-like page state cache
to handle backtracking issues. Thus our URLs end up looking like
http://.com:/ebpp/duSRSod7x598ZkHOQ16p1spKaMzS3yj1Dj_1.1.psc and
contain no user-mea
andle to the Request/Response).
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 9/17/2004 2:12 PM:
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 9/17/2004 11:03 AM:
The main reason I like the use of a DispatchAction is in regard to
situations where you have multiple buttons on a form.
You know, the more I think about I t
Rick Reumann wrote the following on 9/17/2004 11:03 AM:
The main reason I like the use of a DispatchAction
is in regard to situations where you have multiple buttons on a form.
You know, the more I think about I think I might just go back to using
reular ActionForms and not even bother with any
Now my 1 cent worth:)...
(sorry if this is wordy but I do wish some of you comment on it.. esp
Martin and Niall because I'd be interested in your approaches)..
First off, I've used all the flavors of DispatchAction available so I'm
familiar with their use. I'm certainly anti LookupDispatchAction
Not sure which list this question/topic really belongs on so posting to
both. (I'm bringing it up on the dev list because I'm thinking maybe the
base MappingDispatchAction could/should be modified).
Some design background. I like to keep related tasks belonging in one
Dispatch Action class (fla
Susan Bradeen wrote:
And the biggest _THANK YOU_ to you, James, for leading the team through
the release process home stretch. Congratulations, Struts Team. Drinks all
around! :)
dittos to you guys. (Hopefully soon this lazy bumb typing this message
can try and get involved with actually helpin
Martin Cooper wrote:
The 'struts' directory has only existed for a few hours, so it's not
surprising that it's not on all the mirrors yet.
Oh Didn't know it wasn't always there:) I guess maybe I did
used to always go through the jarkarta link to get to Struts. I can't
remember. No biggie.
--
I think it would be helpful if we could provide a quick way to get right
to the latest binary without having to find the struts directory on one
of the mirrors. I just got confused myself since some of the mirrors
don't seem to have the struts directory even listed (so I guessed that
it must be
26 matches
Mail list logo
