Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.3.6 Test Build available

2007-01-23 Thread Paul Benedict
What a bummer. I am sorry I missed this, although the cookbook had an example and this didn't happen to me. But anyway, at least it's fixed. Thanks Niall for doing this. Niall Pemberton wrote: I found a problem with Struts 1.3.6 in the LinkTag: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-299

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.3.6 Test Build available

2007-01-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
I found a problem with Struts 1.3.6 in the LinkTag: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2998 I was going to try and implement version 1.3.6 at work - but since it makes every page in my app look strange (due to the syles being applied to the link x2) - I can't and it makes this version

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.3.6 Test Build available

2007-01-19 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/19/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a typical wait time between releasing a test and calling a vote on it? 36hrs? 1 week? We usually leave a week, to give people a chance to try it out and provide their feedback. -- Martin Cooper Paul Paul Benedict wrote: > The

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.3.6 Test Build available

2007-01-19 Thread Paul Benedict
Is there a typical wait time between releasing a test and calling a vote on it? 36hrs? 1 week? Paul Paul Benedict wrote: The test build of Struts 1.3.6 is now available. No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of Struts 1.3.6 has been made, and at this time it is simply

[ANNOUNCE] Struts 1.3.6 Test Build available

2007-01-17 Thread Paul Benedict
The test build of Struts 1.3.6 is now available. No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of Struts 1.3.6 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a quality vote is called fo