Re: [S2] Taglib Exercises Appilcation and ShowCase Expectations

I'm not sure it is practical for a junit test to test all the variations of the tags. Just setting up the expected output would be very tedious. I like the idea of having a taglib showcase to test all the tags--I looked at showcase the other day to see if it had this and it didn't. Also, bei

Re: [S2] Taglib Exercises Appilcation and ShowCase Expectations

Except that I'd have to learn to write them :) On Nov 4, 2007 7:51 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The junit tests actually have a pretty good set of functional, black > box tests for the tags, although there are holes. Therefore, I don't > think showing every single tag for the purpos

Re: [S2] Taglib Exercises Appilcation and ShowCase Expectations

The junit tests actually have a pretty good set of functional, black box tests for the tags, although there are holes. Therefore, I don't think showing every single tag for the purposes of testing is necessary. Kudos for taking up showcase cleanup banner. Don On 11/4/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROT

[S2] Taglib Exercises Appilcation and ShowCase Expectations

Following up on , and dealing with Tag QA generally, I wonder if we should have a "taglib exercises" application that provides a simple visual test suite against the tags, as we do for Struts 1. My concern is that it would start to overlap with what