Re: (Not a vote) Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-14 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Friday 13 November 2009 10:03:13 pm Dave Newton wrote: > Just dropping a note to let folks know I'm alive, and won't have a > chance to look at this for another week or so. A death in the family, a > new job, and life kinda took over for a bit there :/ > > Dave Dave, sorry to hear... Don't wo

Re: (Not a vote) Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
Sorry to hear that Dave, good to know you are out there :) musachy On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Dave Newton wrote: > Just dropping a note to let folks know I'm alive, and won't have a chance to > look at this for another week or so. A death in the family, a new job, and > life kinda took ove

(Not a vote) Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-13 Thread Dave Newton
Just dropping a note to let folks know I'm alive, and won't have a chance to look at this for another week or so. A death in the family, a new job, and life kinda took over for a bit there :/ Dave Wes Wannemacher wrote: The Struts 2.1.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * [http://c

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-11 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Sorry it has taken so long, but I am going to call this vote... There were 5 +1 votes, 3 were binding. Binding +1 votes - Wes Wannemacher Musachy Barroso Rene Gielen Non-Binding +1 votes - Eric Chijioke alvins (alvins1...@hotmail.com) I will start pushing artifacts out and post the announcement

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-11-03 Thread Rene Gielen
+1 GA (binding) Wes Wannemacher schrieb: > The Struts 2.1.8 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.8.1] > > Distribution: > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/] > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * [http

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-30 Thread Obinna
+1 On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Rene Gielen wrote: > Sorry guys, but currently any spare time is reserved for sleeping :) > Hope to be able to test drive it this weekend. > > - Rene > > Wes Wannemacher schrieb: > > Ping?... > > > > The vote has been open for almost a week. Does anyone else

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-28 Thread Rene Gielen
Sorry guys, but currently any spare time is reserved for sleeping :) Hope to be able to test drive it this weekend. - Rene Wes Wannemacher schrieb: > Ping?... > > The vote has been open for almost a week. Does anyone else have the > bandwidth to test 2.1.8.1? > > I'd like to wrap this up, one w

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-27 Thread alvins
+1 GA Looks fine to me - been using it for couple of weeks now. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-2.1.8.1-Vote-tp25982861p26090089.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-27 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Ping?... The vote has been open for almost a week. Does anyone else have the bandwidth to test 2.1.8.1? I'd like to wrap this up, one way or the other. If no one else chimes in, I can close the voting... But since the docs are screwy in 2.1.8, I'd like to be patient and hope for another vote. -W

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-20 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Christian Stone wrote: > Since Struts 2.1.8 is incompatible with FreeMarker 2.4 (bug  WW-2766 and > WW-3275) which is bundled in 2.1.8, I would hope you are delivering this > build with FreeMarker  2.2.1 (and actually it seems fine with 2.3 as well). >  However, th

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-20 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think you meant "sitemesh" instead of freemarker right? FreeMarker 2.3.15 is what is bundled with Struts 2.1.8.x. On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Christian Stone wrote: > WW-3275 -- Screw John Galt, who is Martin Gainty? ---

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-20 Thread Christian Stone
Since Struts 2.1.8 is incompatible with FreeMarker 2.4 (bug WW-2766 and WW-3275) which is bundled in 2.1.8, I would hope you are delivering this build with FreeMarker 2.2.1 (and actually it seems fine with 2.3 as well). However, there are a number of us who use FreeMarker and Sitemesh, a

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-20 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Here's my +1 GA... -Wes On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > +1 GA. I have been using it and it works fine. I also tested unzipping > the files in windows xp and that was fixed as well. > > musachy > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: >> The Struts 2.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-20 Thread Musachy Barroso
+1 GA. I have been using it and it works fine. I also tested unzipping the files in windows xp and that was fixed as well. musachy On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > The Struts 2.1.8 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * [http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/di

[VOTE] Struts 2.1.8.1 Vote

2009-10-20 Thread Wes Wannemacher
The Struts 2.1.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * [http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.8.1] Distribution: * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/] Maven 2 staging repository: * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/m2-staging-reposito