Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even > part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really > need to wait 3 days for it? > > I wanted to get a 2.1 build rolling before everyone left for the > h

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:35 PM, James Holmes wrote: > +1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote > for. You might want to check the archives. Spending 15 seconds at MarkMail shows that we have voted on Struts Annotations 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3 and now 1.0.4

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Wes Wannemacher
+1 if we don't normally vote on it, it doesn't make sense to hold up progress. //not PMC, just adding opinion On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 20:35 -0500, James Holmes wrote: > +1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote > for. > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Musachy

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even > part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really > need to wait 3 days for it? It may not be part of the distribution, but it is still a release, an

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread James Holmes
+1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote for. On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even > part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really > need to wait 3 da

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really need to wait 3 days for it? I wanted to get a 2.1 build rolling before everyone left for the holidays. Can we just get rid of the voting for it altogether? musac

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts > Annotations release 1.0.4 What Martin said. Unless I missed something, you only posted the vote last night... I realize it's a pain to wait when you want to do a Struts rele

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Martin Cooper
You're calling it after 19 hours? What happened to 72 hours? -- Martin Cooper On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts > Annotations release 1.0.4 > > Binding: > +1 Don Brown > +1 Rainer Hermanns > +1 Musachy Barros

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
s/James Homes/James Holmes/, sorry ;) On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts > Annotations release 1.0.4 > > Binding: > +1 Don Brown > +1 Rainer Hermanns > +1 Musachy Barroso > +1 James Homes > > I'll post an announc

[VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

2008-12-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts Annotations release 1.0.4 Binding: +1 Don Brown +1 Rainer Hermanns +1 Musachy Barroso +1 James Homes I'll post an announcement when the files are available. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd