On 12/23/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> > It's only nowdays that XML config
> > is out of fashion.
>
> I disagree on 2 levels.
> #1. I think everyone likes one simple XML. The noise was on some long
> and mutiple xmls frameworks.
> #2. Who care what the fad is
Craig McClanahan wrote:
It's only nowdays that XML config
is out of fashion.
I disagree on 2 levels.
#1. I think everyone likes one simple XML. The noise was on some long
and mutiple xmls frameworks.
#2. Who care what the fad is!
Oh well. I can use CoR anywhere I want,
It sure would be a wa
On 12/23/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One nice thing about Struts and Spring is that *everyone* knows how to
> start examining and working on the application.
> Just go to the config.xml!
>
> It tells you where to start and what gets called and I can open it and
> start there. Once you
One nice thing about Struts and Spring is that *everyone* knows how to
start examining and working on the application.
Just go to the config.xml!
It tells you where to start and what gets called and I can open it and
start there. Once you get rid of a config .xml, there is no guide to the
appl
On 12/23/05, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At JavaPolis, I showed a couple of Ajax demos using Shale remote method
> calls. After the demos, I got to thinking...
>
> The back-end stuff for remoting--AbstractListCompletions and company--is
> great. Bu
At JavaPolis, I showed a couple of Ajax demos using Shale remote method
calls. After the demos, I got to thinking...
The back-end stuff for remoting--AbstractListCompletions and company--is
great. But I don't understand the requirement that remote calls must be made
to Commons Chain com
