Michael Rasmussen wrote:
what about writing a custom ant task that gets the jars from ibiblio
or wherever they are from?
+1
SVN lets your re-org directories so... I hope somehting happens to
simplify build. If I can repeat a good prectice is " one jar/war = one
directory = one project . "
Bu
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:36:10 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also, why do we have so many copies of the mailreader example all over the
> place? Why can't we just keep one copy and have a build that can handle
> building for core or chain or shale or xyz?
>
For the most part
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:07:11 -0600, Michael Rasmussen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about writing a custom ant task that gets the jars from ibiblio
> or wherever they are from?
We hardly need a custom task. Ant already has the task:
http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/get.html
This is wha
As I understand it, the key to improving the build, be it Maven or Ant,
is who will get the job done. There used to be quite a bit of interest
in a Maven build, and some progress was made toward a conversion,
however, the work was never completed. If someone stepped up and
completed the Maven
It's definitely clean-up time, Jim.
The plan for 1.3.x is to separate the core, taglibs, and apps into separate
projects.
The reason our current Maven build is ineffective is because project layout has
"grown in the telling".
The next step is to create standard Maven project layouts for each o
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Struts Developers List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Call me crazy, but I want it all.
At 9:34 AM -08
That, and the fact that we had much more success using it as our
team project management tool than we ever had with Ant, for whatever
reasons.
I should qualify: "we" is my development team at my day job, not "we"
as the Struts community.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
At 9:34 AM -0800 12/9/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
believe we do have some Maven mavens in our midst who likely feel
otherwise. This might sound odd, but perhaps, if we do have people who
are interested in actively pursuing Maven, we shoul
what about writing a custom ant task that gets the jars from ibiblio
or wherever they are from?
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:51:24 -0800 (PST), David Graham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
>
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:51:24 -0800 (PST), David Graham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
> > believe we do have some Maven mavens in our midst who likely feel
> > otherwise. This might sou
--- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
> believe we do have some Maven mavens in our midst who likely feel
> otherwise. This might sound odd, but perhaps, if we do have people who
> are interested in actively pursuing Maven,
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:36:10 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, this is not spam.
>
> Am I the only one frustrated with our current build situation?
>
> This is my selfish desire for a clean build of all things under struts/*
>
> A friend and I were discussing some of the rece
No, this is not spam.
Am I the only one frustrated with our current build situation?
This is my selfish desire for a clean build of all things under struts/*
A friend and I were discussing some of the recent goings-on and just for the
hell of it I decided to try to build and deploy all of the exam
13 matches
Mail list logo
