committed.
musachy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Please check it into svn and publish the site instead of editing
> directly on people.a.o. It belongs here [1] next to the .htaccess
> file.
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/src/site/resources/
>
> Thank
Please check it into svn and publish the site instead of editing
directly on people.a.o. It belongs here [1] next to the .htaccess
file.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/src/site/resources/
Thanks,
--
Wendy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> you beat me to
: Re: Confusion over draft docs
I'd rather it wasn't the first Google hit, but I wouldn't know how to go
about changing that.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I would go for the big draft thing.
>
> musachy
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James Holmes
wrote:
>
you beat me to it :). I added a robots.txt to p.a.o:/www/struts.apache.org
musachy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
> Robots.txt is the de-facto standard for controlling what gets indexed
> (http://www.robotstxt.org/)
>
> Maybe there should be a robots.txt with;
>
> User-agent: *
Robots.txt is the de-facto standard for controlling what gets indexed
(http://www.robotstxt.org/)
Maybe there should be a robots.txt with;
User-agent: *
Disallow: /2.x
in the struts.apache.org webdoc root, and possibly add the noarchive tags to the
pages as a double check
(http://www.google.
I'd rather it wasn't the first Google hit, but I wouldn't know how to go
about changing that.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
I would go for the big draft thing.
musachy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James Holmes wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Twice now on the use
I would go for the big draft thing.
musachy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James Holmes wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
>> Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
>> Struts 2.1 versions.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the first hit for '
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
> Struts 2.1 versions.
>
> Unfortunately, the first hit for 'Struts 2' is the
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x *draft* docs index page, and that's how
> they're finding it
Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
Struts 2.1 versions.
Unfortunately, the first hit for 'Struts 2' is the
http://struts.apache.org/2.x *draft* docs index page, and that's how
they're finding it.
Can we plaster a big "DRAFT" at the top of that page, or otherwis
