over draft docs
I'd rather it wasn't the first Google hit, but I wouldn't know how to go
about changing that.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
I would go for the big draft thing.
musachy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James Holmes ja...@jamesholmes.com
wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM
Please check it into svn and publish the site instead of editing
directly on people.a.o. It belongs here [1] next to the .htaccess
file.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/src/site/resources/
Thanks,
--
Wendy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com
committed.
musachy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Please check it into svn and publish the site instead of editing
directly on people.a.o. It belongs here [1] next to the .htaccess
file.
[1]
Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
Struts 2.1 versions.
Unfortunately, the first hit for 'Struts 2' is the
http://struts.apache.org/2.x *draft* docs index page, and that's how
they're finding it.
Can we plaster a big DRAFT at the top of that page, or otherwise
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
Struts 2.1 versions.
Unfortunately, the first hit for 'Struts 2' is the
http://struts.apache.org/2.x *draft* docs index page, and that's how
they're
I would go for the big draft thing.
musachy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James Holmes ja...@jamesholmes.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Twice now on the user list there have been questions about unreleased
Struts 2.1 versions.
I'd rather it wasn't the first Google hit, but I wouldn't know how to go
about changing that.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
I would go for the big draft thing.
musachy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James Holmes ja...@jamesholmes.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Wendy Smoak
Robots.txt is the de-facto standard for controlling what gets indexed
(http://www.robotstxt.org/)
Maybe there should be a robots.txt with;
User-agent: *
Disallow: /2.x
in the struts.apache.org webdoc root, and possibly add the noarchive tags to the
pages as a double check
