Re: Struts Coverity Scan

2019-05-13 Thread Lukasz Lenart
niedz., 12 maj 2019 o 09:14 i...@flyingfischer.ch napisał(a): > > Just stumbled over: > > https://scan.coverity.com/projects/apache-struts-2 > > Could this be of interest? I have requested access to the project we will see how it goes. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.p

Struts Coverity Scan

2019-05-12 Thread i...@flyingfischer.ch
Just stumbled over: https://scan.coverity.com/projects/apache-struts-2 Could this be of interest? Best Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.o

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Martin Cooper
On Jan 17, 2008 4:10 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's a company that's been scanning open source project codebases > for static flaws. In November 2007, they announced that Java projects > are being added. > > * http://www.coverity.com/html/press_story51_11_20_07.html > > There

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Matt Raible
+1 - it certainly doesn't sound like a bad thing to do. Matt On Jan 17, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Ted Husted wrote: There's a company that's been scanning open source project codebases for static flaws. In November 2007, they announced that Java projects are being added. * http://www.coverity.com/ht

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
+1 sounds good. musachy On Jan 17, 2008 9:54 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1; I'm a huge fan of various code analysis techniques, and I'd rather we > controlled our own ignore-ance from a position of knowledge. > > d. > > > --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's a

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Dave Newton
+1; I'm a huge fan of various code analysis techniques, and I'd rather we controlled our own ignore-ance from a position of knowledge. d. --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's a company that's been scanning open source project codebases > for static flaws. In November 2007, they an

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Al Sutton
ED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:08 PM Subject: Re: Coverity Scan On 1/17/08, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2008/1/17, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If we are not already on the list, my question is whether we

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Philip Luppens
On 1/17/08, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/17, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > If we are not already on the list, my question is whether we would > > like to opt-in now or not? > > > > I think it is the case: in Struts 2 we had two major security problems, and > probab

Re: Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/1/17, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If we are not already on the list, my question is whether we would > like to opt-in now or not? I think it is the case: in Struts 2 we had two major security problems, and probably a new one is arised. Antonio

Coverity Scan

2008-01-17 Thread Ted Husted
There's a company that's been scanning open source project codebases for static flaws. In November 2007, they announced that Java projects are being added. * http://www.coverity.com/html/press_story51_11_20_07.html There's been the odd email about using these projects foundation-wide, possibly b