yeah.. 3.0 and it needs some rework but I would like to extend the
plugin and add support for Comet and so on
2015-06-19 11:12 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> Current version is 3.0:
> http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/index.html
>
> Or is this version no
Current version is 3.0:
http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/index.html
Or is this version not compatible?
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2015-06-19 11:07 GMT+02:00 Martin Gainty :
>
> +1 for upgrading plu
+1 for upgrading plugin to DWR2.0 using Comet (implementing Ajax Long-polling)
Dzięki
Martin
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:08:54 +0200
> Subject: Re: DWR plugin
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> Good to know. :-)
>
> The plugin documentation is
Good to know. :-)
The plugin documentation is really basic. Maybe some example there and/or a
example application would be nice.
https://struts.apache.org/docs/dwr-plugin.html
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2015-06-19 9:00 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> Hi all,
>
> just want to ask if somebody is using the DWR plugin.
> I checked this plugin and realize that it is based on an old version of DWR.
>
> I never used it and I never read some things about it.
> Is this a candidate for
Hi all,
just want to ask if somebody is using the DWR plugin.
I checked this plugin and realize that it is based on an old version of DWR.
I never used it and I never read some things about it.
Is this a candidate for deprecation or on the other site should we upgrade
it to a newer version of
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
Were you going to be able to get those DWR JIRAs? If not, I'll bump
them to 2.1.8 or later.
Probably should bump them, unless that guy that says he knows what the
problem is does something. I keep thinking I'll have time, and am almost
invariably wrong :(
Dave,
Were you going to be able to get those DWR JIRAs? If not, I'll bump
them to 2.1.8 or later.
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Author - Struts 2 In Practice
Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more
http://www.manning.com/wannem
Cool, I'm not going to push for release over the weekend. There are
quite a few open issues I'm trying to take care of. I think I can get
through quite a bit, but didn't want to try DWR since I've never used
it.
-Wes
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
>
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
Anyone got a pretty handle on DWR? I've never used it personally, but
there are a few bugs currently open against our integration -
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3138
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3132
If there are non-committers out there
Anyone got a pretty handle on DWR? I've never used it personally, but
there are a few bugs currently open against our integration -
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3138
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3132
If there are non-committers out there that know DWR, I'
Don Brown wrote:
3. Your private remote API is your public API - your Ajax app is just
another consumer of your remote api. This makes tools like mashups
possible with no extra work. DWR endpoints aren't meant to be
consumed externally.
I think this point especially is where the val
corresponding template/jsp
3. Your private remote API is your public API - your Ajax app is just
another consumer of your remote api. This makes tools like mashups
possible with no extra work. DWR endpoints aren't meant to be
consumed externally.
I'm not saying DWR isn't a great t
On 10/28/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys, comments inline
Don Brown wrote:
> Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is
Hi guys, comments inline
Don Brown wrote:
> Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too much dwr
> configuration. I wonder if
Sounds cool!
Frank
Don Brown wrote:
Not the same, but it enables the capability of WW-1330 in a more
transparent way to the Action. My thought is first we should put the
plumbing in place to allow the selection of results outside the Action,
then we should start adding features that take ad
Not the same, but it enables the capability of WW-1330 in a more
transparent way to the Action. My thought is first we should put the
plumbing in place to allow the selection of results outside the Action,
then we should start adding features that take advantage of that
capability. WW-1330 is
maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too much dwr
> configuration. I wonder if there is a way we could push it into a
> plugin, that by simply dropping the plugin jar in WEB-INF/lib, you'd b
.
> > > I raised the question today on Don Browns blog about being able to
> have
> > > integration between Struts2 and DWR, to get a full MVC model if you
> only
> > > want to re-render a snippet of a web-page.
> > > I am not sure if this has been discussed p
maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too much dwr
> configuration. I wonder if there is a way we could push it into a
> plugin, that by simply dropping the plugin jar in WEB-INF/lib, you'd b
On 10/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too much dwr
configuration. I wonder if the
On 10/26/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/26/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> > I raised the question today on Don Browns blog about being able to
have
etween Struts2 and DWR, to get a full MVC model if you only
want to re-render a snippet of a web-page.
I am not sure if this has been discussed previously, but Don encouraged
me to send my ideas if I had any, so here goes:
When I have done AJAX-based stuff, 9 times out of 10, all I really want
t
Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too much dwr
configuration. I wonder if there is a way we could push it into a
plugin, that by s
On 10/26/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/25/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi.
> I raised the question today on Don Browns blog about being able to have
> integration between Struts2 and DWR, to get a full MVC model if you only
> wan
On 10/25/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I raised the question today on Don Browns blog about being able to have
integration between Struts2 and DWR, to get a full MVC model if you only
want to re-render a snippet of a web-page.
I am not sure if this has been discussed prev
emember you participating to the discussion :))
What code came out of it, other than the webwork dwr package? If that code is
for
webwork, then I'd imagine it wouldn't work with Struts 2.
As it is right now... no I don't think it will; but the changes should
be absolut
Ah, those discussions after JavaOne:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg22396.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg22381.html
To be honest, I didn't really follow them at the time. What code came
out of it, other than the webwork dwr package? If
s), I think it is
better for it out there.
What exactly does it do?
Simply put it allows you to call from DWR a normal action, passing
through its normal execution chain. The result can be the rendered
result (as in normal action invocations) or a serialized action object
(as in ).
.
Hmm...probably because I didn't know about it :) Should we move the
code back into Struts 2? What exactly does it do?
Don
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
Wille, I have contributed a long time ago some (similar?) code to DWR.
You can find it in the DWR trunk (a webwork package) . This
integr
Wille, I have contributed a long time ago some (similar?) code to DWR.
You can find it in the DWR trunk (a webwork package) . This
integration code is based on some work I initially done for InfoQ.com.
Sure, if you find places where your ideas look better then my approach
I would be happy to
Hi.
I raised the question today on Don Browns blog about being able to have
integration between Struts2 and DWR, to get a full MVC model if you only
want to re-render a snippet of a web-page.
I am not sure if this has been discussed previously, but Don encouraged
me to send my ideas if I had any
thanks for your reply. i already solved the problem.
I missed something that it is said in this site:
http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/getstarted
"The new creator that we used above uses the public no-args constructor that
all JavaBeans must have"
the class ListaLocalidadSqlMapDa
Can you be any more specific about the failure your seeing? Any errors in your
logs? Have you verified that your
ListaLocalidadSqlMapDao.getListaLocalidadByIdMunicipio() is getting executed?
Have you gone to the DWR debug page to see that everything was set up properly
as far as DWR goes
For patches to existing classes, we do operate on the premise that
there's an implicit grant, but when people start donating entire
classes, we like to have an explicit licensing agreement on file.
-Ted.
On 6/5/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This looks weird, because as far as
This looks weird, because as far as I knew contributions submitted
through JIRA are already granting the copyright if not otherwise
expressed.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 6/5/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since this donation includes standalone classes, we should ask Frank
t
Thanks Ted, I just faxed it over a minute ago... I just hope whoever looks
at it can read my handwriting, I have *seriously* atrocious penmanship!
It still needs to be sent in, correct?
Frank
On Mon, June 5, 2006 1:20 pm, Ted Husted wrote:
> Since this donation includes standalone classes, we s
Since this donation includes standalone classes, we should ask Frank
to file a CLA to cover this donation and any others.
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
I don't think we need to wait for it to go on file before accepting
the donation, but Frank should confirm that he is willing and ab
Hi Ian,
Your very welcome! It was fun working on it, learned quite a bit about WW
in the process... I opened a JIRA ticket that includes everything:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1330
It has a link to a complete webapp demonstrating it (too big to attach to
the ticket I thought), bu
Frank -
Thanks again for all the work you've done on this front! Email the code
to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll take a look over it and commit it to the
saf project. If there are some interesting classes, you might want to
add them to the JIRA issuse for discussion
/Ian
Frank W. Zammett
FYI, for anyone that's interested and been following this discussion, I
finally got this all working, just need a few hours tomorrow night to do
some final polishing and documentation (not that it'll be perfect out of
the gate anyway, but I'd like to get as close as possible).
In short, there
Argh... just so no one thinks I forgot about this... I've had to work
from home all this week for various unforeseen reasons, and of course as
a pessimist like myself would expect, the mostly working code got lost
since this weekend. Thought there was a copy on my thumb drive, but of
course no
>
> Ted and Jason, I did see your messages about
> AroundInterceptor and
> Result correspondingly... right now, in the interest
> of simply getting
> it working, I'm just doing a simple AroundInterceptor
> using before() and
> after(), one interceptor for XML and one for JSON
> (although as I j
Thanks guys... quick update... I took yesterday off, so I'm not quite as
far as I would have liked :) It *is* memorial day weekend after all!
However, I did on Friday get reasonably far... at this moment, I have
XML input working for simple (i.e., non-collection) Action fields, as
well as out
The AroundInterceptor is an abstraction (that we've recently discussed
deprecating).
The cannonical idiom is to to call {{invocaton.invoke();}} to separate
any "before" code from any "after" code. The invoke method let any
other Interceptors and the Action fire.
The simplest example might from
On 5/25/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Likewise, isn't JSON content supposed to be sent with
"text/javascript"?
actually, no, "application/json"
"text/*" types are meant to be things that are more human readable,
despite the historic reality of "text/javascript"
http://www.i
>
> It's been talked about here, but I don't know how
> much interest there
> might be... At this moment I'm grabbing the code I
> started and intend to
> finish it this weekend...
>
> My plan is to create 4 interceptors. Two for input
> and two for output,
> one each for XML and one each for JS
> Likewise, isn't JSON content supposed to be sent with "text/javascript"?
actually, no, "application/json"
"text/*" types are meant to be things that are more human readable,
despite the historic reality of "text/javascript"
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crockford-jsonorg-json-
On Thu, May 25, 2006 2:30 pm, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> My plan is to create 4 interceptors. Two for input and two for output,
> one each for XML and one each for JSON.
See, I learned something already... I thought there was a difference
between Interceptors that fire before and after an Action,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 2:47 pm, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> I would expect a well-behaved client to set the content type on the
> incoming
> request to "text/xml" for XML content, so you should be able to check
> that.
Yes, I think that's a reasonable assumption (something, I'm ashamed to
say, my Ajax
On 5/25/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 2:12 pm, Jason Carreira wrote:
> I'm still waiting to see how this plays out... I've been a big proponent
> of Dojo and built several Dojo widgets, but I understand that it can be
> tricky and not as easy to use as we'
On Thu, May 25, 2006 2:12 pm, Jason Carreira wrote:
> I'm still waiting to see how this plays out... I've been a big proponent
> of Dojo and built several Dojo widgets, but I understand that it can be
> tricky and not as easy to use as we'd all like. I think there'll be room
> for different strateg
>
> No, I definitely would love to see ajax support...I
> just think it needs
> to be done right. Integrating DWR looks like it
> might get a bit messy.
> Taking ideas from DWR, maybe even some of the code
> and/or the js libs,
> and building the support directly into
support...I just think it
needs to be done right. Integrating DWR looks like it might get a bit
messy. Taking ideas from DWR, maybe even some of the code and/or the
js libs, and building the support directly into SAF2 would be a better
option. That way the look and feel of writing ajax
at people tend to overload Actions with too much
business responsibility, and integrating DWR with Struts would only
encourage that.
In SAF1 putting too much on Actions is considered a bad idea because
those Actions are coupled to the web layer. Actions are used as an
adapter between HTTP and the b
it needs
to be done right. Integrating DWR looks like it might get a bit messy.
Taking ideas from DWR, maybe even some of the code and/or the js libs,
and building the support directly into SAF2 would be a better option.
That way the look and feel of writing ajax enabled actions is the same
ng this
thread develop. I'm going to come out in the open and say I've never used
DWR or even looked at it's documentation. When I've used ajax
functionality in the past we've simply made the XmlHttpRequest hit an
action that in turn hits a JSP page with the contentType set to xm
I'm going to take a moment to chime in here as I've been watching this
thread develop. I'm going to come out in the open and say I've never used
DWR or even looked at it's documentation. When I've used ajax
functionality in the past we've simply made the XmlHtt
that people tend to overload Actions
> with too much
> > business responsibility, and integrating DWR with
> Struts would only
> > encourage that.
> >
>
> Would you rather prefer to have your requests served
> directly by your
> services? Or by the domain model objects? I
On Wed, May 24, 2006 12:09 pm, Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>>On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
>> > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
>>> about why someone would wan
On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
>> about why someone would want to &
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:22 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
> "call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
> everything exposed by the server mus
At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts? I've
only used it a bit, but
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:22 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
> "call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
> everything exposed by the server must be an action. This allows me to
> re-use almost everythin
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 10:46 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>>I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently about it... I
>>would agree though that if DWR is going to make HTTP calls to execute
>>Actions (a sug
ixing AJAX with normal HTTP request usage.
hth,
./alex
--
:Architect of InfoQ.com:
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:46 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently about it...
At 10:46 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently about it... I
would agree though that if DWR is going to make HTTP calls to execute
Actions (a suggestion I might add that I made about two months ago to Joe
with regard to how
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1260?page=all ]
Rainer Hermanns reassigned WW-1260:
---
Assign To: Rainer Hermanns
> Quickstart does not work well with DWR
> --
>
> Key: WW-1260
&g
68 matches
Mail list logo
