Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-03-02 Thread mraible
I'd like to suggest that whatever you decide, the codebehind plugin uses this same constant for its setting. I think it makes sense to combine code-behind and zero-config, no? Spring MVC uses a prefix/suffix for its ViewResolvers - works very nice IMO. Matt husted wrote: > > On 2/28/07, mrai

Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-03-01 Thread Ted Husted
On 2/28/07, mraible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One change I'd like to see to the codebehind plugin is the ability to specify the default location of pages. For example WEB-INF/pages. Or is that what the "struts.codebehind.defaultPackage" constant is for? I'd like to see that for all results. W

Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-02-28 Thread Tom Schneider
Guys, I think the codebehind plugin already supports all this. (The codebehind plugin consists of 1 whole java file!!) The property for default location of jsp's is: struts.codebehind.pathPrefix The docs just need to be updated. Looking at the code, it looks like it also supports all resu

Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-02-28 Thread Dave Newton
--- "David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd also like to expand support so that all result > values can be used as post fixes. Instead of > supporting just page-success.jsp and > page-input.jsp, why not support > page-whatevertheresultis.jsp. Thoughts? +1 (I actually thought that wa

Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-02-28 Thread David H. DeWolf
mraible wrote: Yes, this is what I'm looking for, and I was able to use it successfully. Strangely enough, I couldn't get the @Result annotation to work with zero config. Is there anything special I need to do for that? I use it and don't recall anything special. Do you have errors that are

Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-02-28 Thread mraible
Yes, this is what I'm looking for, and I was able to use it successfully. Strangely enough, I couldn't get the @Result annotation to work with zero config. Is there anything special I need to do for that? One change I'd like to see to the codebehind plugin is the ability to specify the default l

Re: Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-02-28 Thread Tom Schneider
See http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/codebehind-plugin.html The very first line from the docs are: * Default results* - The purpose of most Actions is to execute code to prepare the data for a specific page. The name of this page is often the same as the Action itself. Is this not what your

Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result

2007-02-28 Thread mraible
Is there a default success result when using Zero configuration? I'd like to see this feature added. Spring MVC has something similar, as does Tapestry. It's quite nice to simple create a controller, as well as a view without having to configure anything. http://www.springframework.org/docs/ref