Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/28/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think that's a fair outcome, but those URLs are a spurious argument. That's 2 apps, Jira and Jive, not a majority of all apps. I think we're losing track of the original notion of replacing the hardwired, special-case code with a general-

Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Patrick Lightbody
Done. - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=41565&messageID=83030#83030 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad

Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Ted Husted
It's now been 72 hours since we posted the vote regarding the default setting. If we are counting PMC votes, then the vote was inconclusive. So AFAIAC, whoever does the work can make the decision as to the default. :) Just be sure to make the commit before I do! :) -Ted. On 8/28/06, Patrick Lig

Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Patrick Lightbody
> I think that's a fair outcome, but those URLs are a > spurious argument. That's 2 apps, Jira and Jive, not > a majority of all apps. Considering that part of why WebWork is where it is today is due to contributions and use by these companies, I'd be very wary to make anything they do not the d

Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Jason Carreira
> > I'm happy to reintroduce a switch, but... > > - It won't be called "compatibility switch", which > implies something else that isn't the root cause for > concern here. > - It will be classified as a "security switch". > - It should be _off_ by default (meaning that it is > the same as WW), c

Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Patrick Lightbody
> Yes, and making "dynamic method invocation" > switchable doesn't affect > anyone's ability to do any of this. Agreed. > Could you please roll back r436991 and r436971 since > without a switch, > we cannot explore alternatives that don't require > special-case code, > nor can we suppress dynamic

Re: Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Ted Husted
Yes, and making "dynamic method invocation" switchable doesn't affect anyone's ability to do any of this. Could you please roll back r436991 and r436971 since without a switch, we cannot explore alternatives that don't require special-case code, nor can we suppress dynamic method invocation for a

Examples of dyanamic method invocation

2006-08-28 Thread Patrick Lightbody
I meant to do this last week - just to provide everyone with some more examples of the ! syntax in use: http://jira.openqa.org/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa http://jira.openqa.org/secure/UpdateUserPreferences!default.jspa http://jira.openqa.org/secure/UserVotes!default.jspa http://jira.openqa.o