On 7/14/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/5/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really want people to understand what is that I am actually
> > advertising ;-), so questions are welcome.
>
> Have you done a version of the infamous Struts MailReader using Struts
>
On 7/5/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really want people to understand what is that I am actually
> advertising ;-), so questions are welcome.
Have you done a version of the infamous Struts MailReader using Struts
Dialog yet?
Many of us are already familiar with the MailRead
I just want to clarify on the Beehive angle... it's a common
misperception that Beehive is all about controls, or all about web
services, or all about page flow. It contains all three fairly
independent pieces (the conceptual link is that all use annotations in
the programming model, and the code
On 7/5/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So are you saying you've implemented the Portlet specification, or some
> subset of it?
>
> If not, I'm not sure I see the point.
>
> If so, why would I choose this over an actual portlet implementation
> (which can be built on top of Stru
So are you saying you've implemented the Portlet specification, or some
subset of it?
If not, I'm not sure I see the point.
If so, why would I choose this over an actual portlet implementation
(which can be built on top of Struts, which is exactly what we use at
work in the form of IBM's port
protected boolean isInput(HttpServletRequest request) {
return "POST".equalsIgnoreCase(request.getMethod());
}
Michael.
Just to state the obvious... one can allwas set up a filter... a lot of
1up.com is in filters to actions.
.V
---
I want to add a little to my previous email. Let's look at Portlet spec.
"A portlet fragment can be aggregated with other fragments to form a
complete document. The content of a portlet is normally aggregated
with the content of other portlets to form the portal page."
Yup, can do that.
"The lif
On 7/5/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About Struts Dialogs, perhaps I missed it, but how does it differ from
> Beehive? They seem to be tackling the same problem and are quite far
> along.
>
> Don
Beehive is an all-ebracing system, they call a "control" anything that
exposes some kin
About Struts Dialogs, perhaps I missed it, but how does it differ from
Beehive? They seem to be tackling the same problem and are quite far
along.
Don
On 7/5/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/5/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Couldn't you create a custom Dispat
On 7/5/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couldn't you create a custom DispatchAction that also takes into account the
> request method?
>
> Don
Actually, this is what I did. The idea was to enhance DispatchAction
and to build a Struts/JSP component framework on it without sliding to
JSF
Couldn't you create a custom DispatchAction that also takes into account the
request method?
Don
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
At 7:11 PM +0100 7/4/05, Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) wrote:
Hi all,
A struts-config.xml file is a great way to formally specify a REST
API. However, with struts 1.2 you cann
At 7:11 PM +0100 7/4/05, Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>A struts-config.xml file is a great way to formally specify a REST
>API. However, with struts 1.2 you cannot configure separate action
>mappings for GET vs POST requests to the same resource. What about
>adding a 'method' attribut
At 7:11 PM +0100 7/4/05, Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) wrote:
Hi all,
A struts-config.xml file is a great way to formally specify a REST
API. However, with struts 1.2 you cannot configure separate action
mappings for GET vs POST requests to the same resource. What about
adding a 'method' attribute
Hi all,
A struts-config.xml file is a great way to formally specify a REST API.
However, with struts 1.2 you cannot configure separate action mappings for GET
vs POST requests to the same resource. What about adding a 'method' attribute
to the 'action' element?
Cheers,
Alistair.
P.S. Sor
14 matches
Mail list logo