2017-03-17 20:46 GMT+01:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
>> That would be awesome but it's hard if there are just few who test the
>> latest test build ;-) That being said, I'm going to extend a test
>> build period and instead of a week give a month for everyone to test
>> it, hope this allow reduce such
> That would be awesome but it's hard if there are just few who test the
> latest test build ;-) That being said, I'm going to extend a test
> build period and instead of a week give a month for everyone to test
> it, hope this allow reduce such problems.
Month seems like a long leap from the wee
2017-03-16 20:23 GMT+01:00 Aaron Johnson :
> Keeping breaking changes in major releases is important. I recently took a
> project from 2.5.8 to 2.5.10.1 and had several compilation errors. Not a
> good surprise when attempting to get a security fix in quickly.
That would be awesome but it's hard i
I agree with respecting major/minor versions concerning breaking changes.
I also encountered an unexpected problem with updating one of our projects
at work to 2.5.10.1 (from 2.5.1), which didn’t even cause a compilation
error.
In my case it was because of the introduction of a parameter object.
Keeping breaking changes in major releases is important. I recently took a
project from 2.5.8 to 2.5.10.1 and had several compilation errors. Not a
good surprise when attempting to get a security fix in quickly.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2017-03-16 13:21 GMT+01:00 C
2017-03-16 13:21 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
> I'd say it is too big for a minor version update -> let's put it in 2.6
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20project%20%3D%20WW%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Regards
--
Ł
> > I like those ideas!
> >
> > Currently it is a bit messy to figure out what can be customized or
used
> > by apps and what are struts internals. Having an explicit API would
clear
> > things up.
>
> Yeah, it should be a bit easier. The question is: do it now or wait
> till Struts 2.6?
>
I'
2017-03-16 10:52 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
> I like those ideas!
>
> Currently it is a bit messy to figure out what can be customized or used
> by apps and what are struts internals. Having an explicit API would clear
> things up.
Yeah, it should be a bit easier. The question is: do it now or
> Subject: Injectable LocaleProvider replaces with LocaleProviderFactory
>
> Hi,
>
> Another PR cleaning up a mess with injecting things ;)
> https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/122
>
> and what do you think about adding a dedicated artefact to keep all
> those interfaces
Hi,
Another PR cleaning up a mess with injecting things ;)
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/122
and what do you think about adding a dedicated artefact to keep all
those interfaces? strust2-api? And move all the APIs there maybe with
default implementations.
Another thing I would like to st
10 matches
Mail list logo
