Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-05-01 Thread Dakota Jack
There are some real problems, in my opinion, with going to Tiger. Tiger, I discovered, in an attempt to get it at least into development, really is very different in a lot of respects. I think it will be slow to get use, even if it is great. On 4/28/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/27/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't find the thread, but 1.4 gets my vote. +1 -- Martin Cooper > Don > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I remember the discussion about the JDK version for Struts 1.3 - but I can't > > remember if an actual decision was made. Have we decided o

Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-28 Thread Ted Husted
On 4/28/05, Pilgrim, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about Java 5.0? > > "Just jokkin' man" If someone had an itch, I'd wager that a Struts Tiger codebase, that leveraged the new language attributes, would be a good way to get started on Struts 2.x. -Ted.

Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
Actually that was discussed... http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg02909.html The thing was we took a decision on the Servlet Spec but the JDK aspect was just discussed. - Original Message - From: "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:10

RE: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-28 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
TED] > Sent: 28 April 2005 14:36 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x > > > 1.4.2 sounds good to me. > > David > > --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't find the thread, but 1.4 gets my vote. > > >

Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-28 Thread David Graham
1.4.2 sounds good to me. David --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't find the thread, but 1.4 gets my vote. > > Don > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I remember the discussion about the JDK version for Struts 1.3 - but I > can't > > remember if an actual decision was made. Have we dec

Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-27 Thread Don Brown
I can't find the thread, but 1.4 gets my vote. Don Niall Pemberton wrote: > I remember the discussion about the JDK version for Struts 1.3 - but I can't > remember if an actual decision was made. Have we decided on JDK 1.4 as a > minimum for Struts 1.3? > > Niall > > > > -

JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
I remember the discussion about the JDK version for Struts 1.3 - but I can't remember if an actual decision was made. Have we decided on JDK 1.4 as a minimum for Struts 1.3? Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For