On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> On an aside, have you definitively decided to move the json interceptor and
>> result-type into the core?
>>
>
> Nobody seems to be against it, so I guess we just have to vote on it.
>
> musachy
>
There were no objections to the original
> On an aside, have you definitively decided to move the json interceptor and
> result-type into the core?
>
Nobody seems to be against it, so I guess we just have to vote on it.
musachy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...
I have created a google code struts2-jquery-plugin project [
http://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery-plugin/] and checked in my initial
code. It is still in its infancy with only basic support for a few tags and
I've already logged a number of issues to work on (most notably, writing
some test case
Validation with JQuery should not be hard using the JSON validation
interceptor. This could be a good time to improve how the tags are
laid out to support adding/removing validation errors, Dave already
brought this up before and I think he did some changes already.
musachy
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 a
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Obinna wrote:
> 2009/2/23 Musachy Barroso
>
>> > I definitely agree that a thoughtful design is the right starting place.
>> > Taking this to the extreme, one thing that I mentioned in my earlier post
>> > (without too much thought) was that perhaps some kind of s
2009/2/23 Musachy Barroso
> > I definitely agree that a thoughtful design is the right starting place.
> > Taking this to the extreme, one thing that I mentioned in my earlier post
> > (without too much thought) was that perhaps some kind of standardized
> > specification for binding ajax feature
> I definitely agree that a thoughtful design is the right starting place.
> Taking this to the extreme, one thing that I mentioned in my earlier post
> (without too much thought) was that perhaps some kind of standardized
> specification for binding ajax features to standard struts tags (including
