l Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 7:09 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: LazyActionForm
I have submitted LazyDynaBean and LazyDynaClass to commons beanutils.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29879
The version of L
rows Lists or Arrays if they
are not big enough to accomodate the index being set.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: LazyActionForm
> Hello,
>
> are
Since the LazyActionForm <http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/> can be validated
like any other ActionForm, I don't see the basis for a technical objection. In the
documentation, we would want to *strongly* recommend using the validated version, and
remind people it is a *bad*
I'm happy to put it into Struts but other committers may object on the basis
that one of the ActionForm's functions is to act as a 'firewall' between the
Request and the Action - the 'LazyActionForm' circumvents this with all the
request parameters being populated
Hello,
are there plans to integrate LazyActionForm form
Nial Pemberton in to struts (or in contrib) ?
since nial is a commiter and it is usefull
to have that functionality *directly* in framework...
regards,
Matthias
-
To
