2013/5/17 JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL :
> Well, the only part that could break backward compatibility is the idea of
> removing filter of cookies by value. But the CookieProviderInterceptor and
> the idea of being able to OGNL-value the accepted cookie names should not
> break anything.
But I think we a
Well, the only part that could break backward compatibility is the idea of
removing filter of cookies by value. But the CookieProviderInterceptor and
the idea of being able to OGNL-value the accepted cookie names should not
break anything.
2013/5/16 Lukasz Lenart
> If this is gonna break backwa
If this is gonna break backward compatibility, please register an
issue with JIRA and we will introduce the change with Struts 2.5/3
version.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/4/4 Maurizio Cucchiara :
>> My proposal would
>> be to simplify the interceptor in two
> My proposal would
> be to simplify the interceptor in two ways:
> 1) Remove the filter by cookie value: I don't know under which
> circumstances that could be useful
I'm not able to identify those circumstances, but AFAIU that filter is
harmless, if you don't define a cookie value, struts will ne
Hi Christian,
unfortunately, as you already noticed, Cookie dealing is the weak link
of Struts.
> the CookieInterceptor currently looks for all available cookies. Lets say
> there
> are cookies x, y, z. Now it would call setX, setY, setZ on the action.
I'm not able to understand what's the pro
>> Porfavor..no altere ni interrumpir esta communicacion...Gracias
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:30:19 -0400
>> > Subject: Re: Cookie Interceptor
>> > From: jlm...@gmail.com
>&
ile JIRA ?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW
>
>
> Saludos Cordiales desde EEUU
> Martin
> __
> Porfavor..no altere ni interrumpir esta communicacion...Gracias
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:30:19 -0400
> > Su
__
Porfavor..no altere ni interrumpir esta communicacion...Gracias
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:30:19 -0400
> Subject: Re: Cookie Interceptor
> From: jlm...@gmail.com
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
>
> I use CookieAware in Struts 2.2.3, and I don
I use CookieAware in Struts 2.2.3, and I don't have any issues for not
having the setters. But I do have a bunch of issues with cookies with name
MENU-STATUS, since the interceptor tries to parse the cookie name as an
OGNL value (ACCEPTED_PATTERN was added later than 2.2.3). My proposal would
be to
