2013/7/2 Paul Benedict :
> My first idea was to add an "actions" attribute on the validator
> annotations. For example:
>
> @RequredStringValidator(key="firstName", actions={ "execute", "forward" })
Or maybe method names? But then the same validation could be executed
for different actions which m
My first idea was to add an "actions" attribute on the validator
annotations. For example:
@RequredStringValidator(key="firstName", actions={ "execute", "forward" })
Lacking the attribute means all methods, of course.
Thoughts?
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2013/6/29
2013/6/28 Umesh Awasthi :
> I worked quite a bit on JSR 303 validations (Both with Hibernate Validation
> as well Apache Bval) and also worked on creating plugin to integrate it
> with Struts2, since with version 2.5/3.0 , we are looking to have some
> major changes so was wondering if i should wai
2013/6/29 Paul Benedict :
> This is the best proposed solution and I am surprised it didn't become part
> of Struts:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-1967
You can do it yourself right away ;-)
> We should add another level of XML filename checking to to be
> --.xml
What about Annotatio
This is the best proposed solution and I am surprised it didn't become part
of Struts:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-1967
We should add another level of XML filename checking to to be
--.xml
Thoughts?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I am glad you're familiar
I am glad you're familiar with validation groups -- because that's exactly
what I was alluding to. I see the Struts 2 documentation allows me to
target validation on a particular method through XML only; Struts 2 simply
lacks the annotation counterpart. If today I have to use XML, okay, but
just wa
I worked quite a bit on JSR 303 validations (Both with Hibernate Validation
as well Apache Bval) and also worked on creating plugin to integrate it
with Struts2, since with version 2.5/3.0 , we are looking to have some
major changes so was wondering if i should wait for Struts 2.5/ 3.0.
On Fri,
This sounds a bit like "inversion of control". As for me, I'd rather not
like to have my model (which is to validate) to have knowledge about the
business side validation is triggered from. When I develop from the action
perpective, I know if the current method is better off triggering
validation o
Hi Paul,
actually there is one way: using @SkipValidation combined with @Validation
Or maybe I miss the point. Is there something better in your approach?
On 28 June 2013 05:38, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I was thinking it would be a good idea to add "String[] actions" on the
> validations. When emp
