It sounds good, thanks for setting this up Wes.
musachy
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2009 13:57:39 Piero Sartini wrote:
>> > But, the problem with this was that wget honors
>> > the new robots.txt file which means wget refuses to pull it down.
On Thursday 15 January 2009 13:57:39 Piero Sartini wrote:
> > But, the problem with this was that wget honors
> > the new robots.txt file which means wget refuses to pull it down.
>
> wget should ignore the robots.txt with the option
> -erobots=off
>
Thanks Piero, using this argument, I was able t
On Thursday 15 January 2009 13:57:39 Piero Sartini wrote:
> > But, the problem with this was that wget honors
> > the new robots.txt file which means wget refuses to pull it down.
>
> wget should ignore the robots.txt with the option
> -erobots=off
>
> (or add the line robots=off in .wgetrc)
>
Oh,
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 12:02 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>
> > Okay, so I've got my account setup on the Apache Hudson instance.
> ...
> > assembly is a great way for me to generate nightlies, and it is sort of
> > a matter of eating our own
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Okay, so I've got my account setup on the Apache Hudson instance.
...
> assembly is a great way for me to generate nightlies, and it is sort of
> a matter of eating our own dogfood. If the assembly doesn't do what we
> want, we should mak
> But, the problem with this was that wget honors
> the new robots.txt file which means wget refuses to pull it down.
wget should ignore the robots.txt with the option
-erobots=off
(or add the line robots=off in .wgetrc)
Piero
---
> Now, my first question is more general. Hudson allows a few different
> triggers for launching builds. Right now, I'm telling it to check SVN
> once a day for changes. To me, this is sufficient, but not quite as
> comprehensive as Bamboo. I'm thinking that since this is a shared
> resource (and w
