t; - Original Message -
> From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Release/Version Notes
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:12:51 -0400, Jam
riginal Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Release/Version Notes
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:12:51 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> It was my impression
I'm not even at
"newbie" status :-)
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Release/Version Notes
> I also ag
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:12:51 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
> It was my impression that Ted would update the release notes and I
> was simply putting some of the other pieces together. I am still a
> newbie to the release process so please be kind.
I did mean to, James, but I just didn't get to it
uot;Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: Release/Version Notes
+1
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:34:03 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Currently we have a 1.2.5 build that has no details of whats
changed in the documentation thats includ
+1
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:34:03 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Currently we have a 1.2.5 build that has no details of whats
> changed in the documentation thats included with it. The problem
> with the way release notes currently work is that the release-
> notes.xml contains the current release
Currently we have a 1.2.5 build that has no details of whats changed in the
documentation thats included with it. The problem with the way release
notes currently work is that the release-notes.xml contains the current
release - but since a new build (like 1.2.5) is created before its voted on
whe
