Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-25 Thread Dakota Jack
Double Hmm? I just tried again, but this time instead of updating all of shale I just did the trunk, and it worked. What is up with that? Jack On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:37:14 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:32:26 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:32:26 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I have probably Bozoed! I clicked on my sandbox repository and > updated with TortoiseSVN. However, I see nothing like what I thought > was being discussed here. Where would I see it and what is it called? > Soun

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Dakota Jack
Well, I have probably Bozoed! I clicked on my sandbox repository and updated with TortoiseSVN. However, I see nothing like what I thought was being discussed here. Where would I see it and what is it called? Sounds like a snipe hunt? ;-) Jack On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:51:33 -0800, Craig McClan

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:39:45 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where is this checked in. folks? We recently reorganized the repository so that independent pieces of "Struts" could be branched and released independently of each other. As a result, the SVN repository for the core of S

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Ted Husted
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:53:00 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote: > It's also a shame that you guys are so focused on the current > version that you haven't had a chance to see the light about the > future too :-). Given that JSF and ASPX are quite similar, you could say that I've been living in the fu

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Dakota Jack
Where is this checked in. folks? Jack On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the > application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be > part of Struts 1.3? Or, for that matter, even p

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread BaTien Duong
Craig McClanahan wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be part of Struts 1.3? That should work fine, as long as 1.3 is goi

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:53:00 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the > > application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be > > pa

Re: Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the > application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be > part of Struts 1.3? That should work fine, as long as 1.3 is going to be based on Servlet

Shale application-wide controller

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Cooper
Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be part of Struts 1.3? Or, for that matter, even part of the Commons Filters component, or even Chain itself? It seems like a much too useful general purpose filter to bury it