On May 1, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Thanks. Which build are you using? I'd like to arrange Standalone
Tiles into modules for Maven 2 so that the example app can live beside
tiles-core, rather than in a separate sandbox project.
Yes, that would be awesome! I am now using the Mave
On 5/1/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. It's not much to speak of, but it's a start. I checked it
into sandbox/tiles-test. The lib directory is empty. It will need
the following jars to run:
Thanks. Which build are you using? I'd like to arrange Standalone
Tiles into modu
If infrastructure would approve my request to run Jive on an ASF server, we
wouldn't be having this discussion :)
In the meantime, you can "watch" the WebWork developer forum, which contains
the chat transcripts posted each night:
http://forums.opensymphony.com/watches!add.jspa?forumID=32
Don
On Apr 28, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Craig mentioned HtmlUnit, which we're now using with Cargo to confirm
that each Action 1 example app will at least deploy and display its
default page. If you'll check in the app you mentioned,
Done. It's not much to speak of, but it's a start
On 4/28/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, after a long winded discussion on the WW Chat line(no need to
rehash, it's in your inbox -- or will be)...
I've seen people make this type of comment before, but I have yet to see any
of these chat transcripts show up in my mailbox
One thing that I might have blurred the lines on is that there are
basically 2 things being proposed here with respect to TestGen4Web.
#1 - The ability to easily create test scripts for cases that
can only be proven and solved via a deployed app (and
without cactus)
#2 - A set of scr
So, after a long winded discussion on the WW Chat line(no need to
rehash, it's in your inbox -- or will be)... several ideas were
mentioned, and so I thought I'd throw it out there for comment.
Patrick has graciously offered to provide the Struts community with
free beer and back rubs!!
Speaking of testing.I recently came across a really cool plugin
for FireFox. It's called TestGen4Web and it let's you record and
save a browser session.
What the heck is a browser session?
Oh, I'm glad you asked. It is the set of step that you (as a user)
do within a browser windo
On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for the test cases, I'm not very familiar with Cactus or some
other web app testing packages. So to save time, I've been testing
using a simple web application and clicking through.
...
I can also check my test app into the sandbox if it
w
>> there's no current implementatino of things like MockPageContext
Craig, there is one in the Spring Framework library. :) Spring contains mocks
of the servlet api. The library doesn't depend on Spring, but they have
their own mocks. Spring uses the MockPageContext to write unit tests for
their
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
The Shale test framework classes include mock implementations of
essentially
all APIs in the servlet spec (as well as JSF, but that's not really
relevant
here). As such, it can be used as a source of things like
MockServletContext, Mock
On 3/22/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 6:04 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> > For a library claiming to be "standalone", I would be a little
> > cautious
> > about depending on either set of mock object APIs.
>
> Certainly, no such dependencies should be in the
On Mar 22, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
It is not an issue anymore because I wrote a workaround in
Dimensions code. It simply clears the "path" attribute of a
definition when it's extended (overloaded) when the extended
definition does not specify the "path" attribute.
The wor
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
Seems a couple of weeks ago you sent an email about a potential bug or
missing piece. We had a short exchange about it and it fell off my
radar as I was trying to make sure I understood what your need was.
It was something about Tiles definitions with extends and path
On Mar 21, 2006, at 6:04 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
For a library claiming to be "standalone", I would be a little
cautious
about depending on either set of mock object APIs.
Certainly, no such dependencies should be in the core software, but
dependencies in the test cases are acceptable
On Mar 22, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
I can work on it for about 1-2 hour a day.
I meant one or two hours a day, not half an hour... It was a bit
ambiguous...
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Uh? Who called me? I obviously will be pleased to help if you
want :-) I could take my experience with Dimensions to add some
missing pieces.
Anyway, if I will be so lucky to help you all, notice that I am
very busy, I can work on it for
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
I can work on it for about 1-2 hour a day.
I meant one or two hours a day, not half an hour... It was a bit
ambiguous...
If you have that much time to spend on it then I envy you :-)
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
I can work on it for about 1-2 hour a day.
I meant one or two hours a day, not half an hour... It was a bit
ambiguous...
If you have that much time to spend on it then I envy you :-)
-
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
I can work on it for about 1-2 hour a day.
I meant one or two hours a day, not half an hour... It was a bit
ambiguous...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
In addition I'm sure there are things that have been raised that I
haven't addressed. especially from Antonio Petrelli.
Uh? Who called me? I obviously will be pleased to help if you want :-) I
could take my experience with Dimensions to add some missing pieces.
Anyway,
On 3/21/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
> >
> > > I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
> > > versus shale for a test framework.
> > >
>
On 3/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
> > versus shale for a test framework.
> >
> > Since I'm in the JSF fan club, I'd argue that we could implement
> > the
>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
> > versus shale for a test framework.
> >
> > Since I'm in the JSF fan club, I'd argue that we could implement
> > the Ext
On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
I suppose that the choice of the context object could favor action
versus shale for a test framework.
Since I'm in the JSF fan club, I'd argue that we could implement
the ExternalContext interface since the JSF API will soon be a given.
I
>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > I wonder if the shale test framework can be leveraged here. There
> > are mock objects for the servlet API.
>
> I need to take a closer look at that. I'm using Struts Test Case in
> a few pl
On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Gary VanMatre wrote:
I wonder if the shale test framework can be leveraged here. There
are mock objects for the servlet API.
I need to take a closer look at that. I'm using Struts Test Case in
a few places in Standalone Tiles already.
2) moving on to Miles
>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've just checked in the last taglib refactoring work that I can
> think of. That turned out to be a much smaller chunk of work than I
> had thought. If you're following the wiki page[1] that means
> Milestone 2 in the 4-step process to release is larg
I've just checked in the last taglib refactoring work that I can
think of. That turned out to be a much smaller chunk of work than I
had thought. If you're following the wiki page[1] that means
Milestone 2 in the 4-step process to release is largely complete.
There's one remaining gaping
29 matches
Mail list logo
