I would vote to close it.
I would also question if a vote is really necessary for an IDE tool code base.
Do you think this is really necessary - especially since it has no effect on
the Struts code base itself? I would hate for you to be hindered on submitting
updates based off the lack of
Would 6.8.0 include commons-fileupload 1.6.0 as I remember a cve in 1.5.
On 07/09/2025 08:50, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hi,
I'm almost ready to prepare these two new test builds, there is one PR
waiting review related to 6.7.0
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1174
All the changes in
I assume we can CLOSE this Vote and focus on another build which
should support IntelliJ 2025.2
https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/pull/28
niedz., 7 wrz 2025 o 09:56 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> czw., 4 wrz 2025 o 14:42 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
> >
> > Wonderin
Hi,
I'm almost ready to prepare these two new test builds, there is one PR
waiting review related to 6.7.0
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1174
All the changes in 6.8.0 - the reset of TODO items I'm going to move
to next 6.x version
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/W
czw., 4 wrz 2025 o 14:42 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
>
> Wondering if most are like me and can't test it out due to version
> conflicts? Can't wait to vote once you get it working on 2025.X
> (although I'm not binding)
Maybe, but as I said, this is more about establishing a proper release
process
Wondering if most are like me and can't test it out due to version
conflicts? Can't wait to vote once you get it working on 2025.X
(although I'm not binding)
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 9/4/2025 6
Can I assume Lazy Consensus in this case?
wt., 2 wrz 2025 o 12:18 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> One more binding vote is needed to close this vote :)
>
> pon., 18 sie 2025 o 11:51 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> >
> > niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 10:54 Lukasz Lenart
> > napisał(a):
> > > [ ] Leave at tes
One more binding vote is needed to close this vote :)
pon., 18 sie 2025 o 11:51 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 10:54 Lukasz Lenart
> napisał(a):
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [X] General Availability (GA)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Cheers
> Łukasz
niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 10:54 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For
+1
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA)
Thank you
Johannes
#
web: https://www.jgeppert.com
Lukasz Lenart schrieb am Mo., 18. Aug. 2025,
07:49:
> niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 17:41 Burton Rhodes
> napisał(a):>
>
niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 17:41 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):>
> Lukasz,
> Thanks for all your hardwork on this. I would love to test it out, but
> I am now on version 2025.2 of IntelliJ. Are you planning on upgrading
> the plugin at some point to work with the 2025.X series?
Yes, the next step is to r
Lukasz,
Thanks for all your hardwork on this. I would love to test it out, but
I am now on version 2025.2 of IntelliJ. Are you planning on upgrading
the plugin at some point to work with the 2025.X series?
Thanks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1 test build is now available.
This version addresses basic compatibility with IntelliJ Platform
2024.2 plus defines a proper build & release pipelines.
Please see the changelog:
https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/v242.189
):
>
> The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1 test build is now available.
> Please see the changelog:
> https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/untagged-148e962bc254f6c38d40
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availabilit
The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1 test build is now available.
Please see the changelog:
https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/untagged-148e962bc254f6c38d40
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is
x
Apache Struts 241.18968.1
https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/1698-apache-struts/edit/versions/stable/816489
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
Vote passed with result:
+1 binding x3
Cheers
Lukasz
sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
> This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK.
> All the changes:
> https://github.co
sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache
+1 (binding)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
#
web: https://www.jgeppert.com
Am Sa., 28. Juni 2025 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Lukasz Lenart <
lukaszlen...@apache.org>:
> The Struts Annotations 2.0 t
+1 GA
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 at 00:24, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
> This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK.
> All the changes:
> https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_
The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK.
All the changes:
https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_ANNOTATIONS_2_0
Staging artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org
jogep opened a new pull request, #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/pull/3
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
Would some pom rules stop these breaking upgrades?
^5.*$
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [struts-community-plugins/struts2-jquery] Update
dependency org.hibernate:hibernate-core to v7 (release/5.0.x) (PR #708)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 22:44:02 -0700
From: renovate
Thanks for pointing this out! Already requested INFRA to archive the repo
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26793
and there is no Struts 1 related versions in
https://downloads.apache.org/struts/
Cheers
--
Łukasz
wt., 6 maj 2025 o 10:42 Arnout Engelen napisał(a):
>
> Hello,
Hello,
It might be good to mark https://github.com/apache/struts1 as 'archived'
and remove unsupported versions from https://downloads.apache.org/struts/ -
could someone have a look at that?
Kind regards,
--
Arnout Engelen
ASF Security Response
Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Me
Vote passed with result:
+1 GA (binding) x3
Thanks a lot!
Łukasz
czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:13 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the
> following issues were addressed:
>
> Bug
> [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke
See
<https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Struts/job/Struts-site-javadocs/27/display/redirect>
Changes:
--
[...truncated 1.86 MiB...]
rewrite
output/maven/struts2-plugins/struts2-velocity-plugin/apidocs/org/apache/struts2/views/velocity/comp
czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:13 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For ad
Vote passed with result:
GA +1 binding x3
GA +1 non-binding x2
Thanks!
Łukasz
czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:09 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> pon., 24 lut 2025 o 13:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [X] General Availability (GA)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
:04, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> pt., 28 lut 2025 o 11:55 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>>
>> Maybe comparing your test case with the showcase setup may give a hint
>> on a config issue.
>>
>> @Lukasz do we need a tag for the last javax examples?
>
> h
pt., 28 lut 2025 o 11:55 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> Maybe comparing your test case with the showcase setup may give a hint
> on a config issue.
>
> @Lukasz do we need a tag for the last javax examples?
https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0
+1 GA
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 5:13 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the
> following issues were addressed:
>
> Bug
> [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components
> [WW-5497] - Access to non-static mem
Works well for me. Thanks.
[x] General Availability (GA)
On 27/02/2025 06:13, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the
following issues were addressed:
Bug
[WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components
[WW-5497] - Access to non
The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the
following issues were addressed:
Bug
[WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components
[WW-5497] - Access to non-static members of class objects fails with
IllegalArgumentException
[WW-5498] - with devMode enabled
pon., 24 lut 2025 o 13:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For ad
I am planning to upgrade to Struts 7, but since the Java version will also be
upgraded, I am still preparing.
Has the EOL for Struts 6 been decided?
-Original Message-
From: Lukasz Lenart
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 11:33 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Cc: sds-devs
Subject: Re
web context listener) and this may cause struts classes to
stay in memory. So it may be a XNIO issue rather than a struts issue.
If you have any hint on what to look into it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
> On 24 Feb 2025, at 15:15, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> sob., 22 lut 2025 o
rtaEE.
I do not plan to force users to migrate, yet this is inevitable. There
can be some external factors which can change the optic (as it was
with Struts 2.5.x) and then it's hard to backport some updates to the
older version. Still, I don't see an immediate requirement to announce
EOL
wt., 25 lut 2025 o 02:51 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a):
>
> I am planning to upgrade to Struts 7, but since the Java version will also be
> upgraded, I am still preparing.
> Has the EOL for Struts 6 been decided?
No decision yet and I don't see an immediate requirement to do it
+1 GA
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:15 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first
> patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following
> issues were addressed:
>
> Bug
> [WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and ".act
[ x] General Availability (GA)
Am 24. Februar 2025 13:14:25 MEZ schrieb Lukasz Lenart
:
>The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first
>patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following
>issues were addressed:
>
>Bug
>[WW-5495] - Tomc
+1 GA non-binding
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 2/24/2025 6:14:25 AM
Subject [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3
The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first
patch release of Struts 7.x series. W
sob., 22 lut 2025 o 13:16 Ing. Andrea Vettori
napisał(a):
> Hope someone can give me an hint on what to look into. I tried to navigate
> the two objects with the memory analyzer but it’s too difficult to understand
> what’s going on.
Could you increase log level to DEBUG and check if you see "D
Thanks, works well for me.
[x] General Availability (GA)
On 24/02/2025 12:14, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first
patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following
issues were addressed:
Bug
[WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and
The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first
patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following
issues were addressed:
Bug
[WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and ".action" send empty page
[WW-5498] - with devMode enabled causes actionError
[WW-5500] - Multipar
can't fully understand myself. I’m using struts
> since year 2000 (version 6.7 at the moment) in web apps with a mix of JSP and
> Freemarker templates. I use Tomcat as servlet container.
> Recently I found that when an app is hot deployed, I constantly find that
> some non heap
The image has been removed. Text only here.
On 22/02/2025 10:38, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote:
Hello,
I’m facing an issue that can't fully understand myself. I’m using struts since
year 2000 (version 6.7 at the moment) in web apps with a mix of JSP and
Freemarker templates. I use Tomc
Hello,
I’m facing an issue that can't fully understand myself. I’m using struts since
year 2000 (version 6.7 at the moment) in web apps with a mix of JSP and
Freemarker templates. I use Tomcat as servlet container.
Recently I found that when an app is hot deployed, I constantly find that
rming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7?
pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP）
napisał(a):
I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4.
Thank you for the fix!
On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
non-breaking chang
sob., 22 lut 2025 o 10:46 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> What is the plan on v6? Continue development or maintenance only?
I would prefer to switch into maintenance mode only, yet it depends on users
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscrib
What is the plan on v6? Continue development or maintenance only?
More might jump to 7 if the latter.
On 21/02/2025 14:33, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Thanks a lot for testing & confirming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7?
pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a):
I've confirme
Thanks a lot for testing & confirming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7?
pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a):
>
> I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4.
>
> Thank you for the fix!
>
> On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> > Hello,
&
I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4.
Thank you for the fix!
On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
> non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any
> help is apprec
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any
help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
Thank you for researching this issue and creating a pull request.
-Original Message-
From: Kusal Kithul-Godage
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 2:28 PM
To: 戸田 栞太（HARP）
Cc: Struts Developers List ; sds-devs
Subject: Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready
Thanks for sharing the full
er;
> > >
> > > This is a bytecode error which occurs when a library targeting JRE8 is
> > > compiled with a JDK greater than 8 but without the '--release 8'
> > > option.
> > >
> > > I've created a PR with a fix: http
the relevant error here is: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip()Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;
> >
> > This is a bytecode error which occurs when a library targeting JRE8 is
> > compiled with a JDK greater than 8 but without the '--release 8'
> > option.
> >
7;ve created a PR with a fix: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1225
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:44 AM 戸田 栞太（HARP） wrote:
> >
> > I used a simple hierarchical structure.
> > Below is the JSP code:
> >
> > ``` sample.jsp
> > <%@ page language="java
27;
option.
I've created a PR with a fix: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1225
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:44 AM 戸田 栞太（HARP） wrote:
>
> I used a simple hierarchical structure.
> Below is the JSP code:
>
> ``` sample.jsp
> <%@ page language="java" contentType=&qu
I used a simple hierarchical structure.
Below is the JSP code:
``` sample.jsp
<%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
pageEncoding="UTF-8"%><%--
--%><%@ taglib prefix="s" uri="/struts-tags" %><%--
-
Could you share the full stacktrace, including the exception thrown
and caused by hierarchy?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 9:14 PM 戸田 栞太（HARP） wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> When using the tag in a JSP with the Struts tags
> library,
> the included page does not appear. The following
Hello,
When using the tag in a JSP with the Struts tags library,
the included page does not appear. The following error is displayed:
Stacktrace:
at
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.handleJspException(JspServletWrapper.java:610)
~[jasper.jar:9.0.71]
at
pon., 17 lut 2025 o 17:27 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):
>
> Thanks Lukasz!
>
> Quick question: With v7.0.3, what is the current status of the Multipart
> upload logic?
>
> These 2 release comments are somewhat conflicting:
> 6.7: WW-5528 Ensure multipart upload illegal characters reported as
> error b
-5501 by @lukaszlenart in #1218
Thanks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Lukasz Lenart"
To "Struts Developers List"
Date 2/17/2025 4:30:25 AM
Subject [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is ready
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any
help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
This test build has been dropped in favour of the new Struts 6.7.3
test build (I will announce it shortly) and the problem should be
addressed, thanks for your time & report!
pon., 10 lut 2025 o 06:53 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a):
>
> I am unable to obtain a token during the form uplo
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking changes.
Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated.
Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
ading to version 6.7.2, are there any necessary adjustments that
need to be made on the application side?
On 2025/02/04 06:59:20 Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
> non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - a
śr., 5 lut 2025 o 05:20 Kusal Kithul-Godage
napisał(a):
>
> I've just tested this with the Confluence Data Center application.
>
> The file name filtering is actually causing a user experience regression for
> us.
>
> Previously, we were able to validate the filename manually and display
> the us
e, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:59 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
> non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any
> help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot.
>
> Here are the change
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any
help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking changes.
Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated.
Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
This test is closed as some issues have been discovered, a new test
build is underway :)
niedz., 2 lut 2025 o 08:38 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking
> changes.
> Please take the time and test the
Thanks for reporting - I believe this should fix the issue
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1209
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 10:19 PM wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it will happen, if you have an include tag before a closing tag - because the
> release method of the PageContext will set t
...@silbergrau.com
Datum: 03.02.2025 11:31
Kopie: "Struts Developers List"
Betreff: Antwort: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.1 test build is ready
Hello Lukasz,
the new lookup against attributeMap can lead to an NPE.
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke
"javax.servlet.ServletRequest.getA
1.jar:6.7.1]
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1193/files
best regrads
-"Lukasz Lenart" schrieb: -
An: "Struts Developers List"
Von: "Lukasz Lenart"
Datum: 02.02.2025 10:33
Betreff: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.1 test build is ready
Hello,
This is a pat
niedz., 2 lut 2025 o 12:10 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> ok. If you can post the fix I can test it.
Here is the fix
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1203
> btw, I tried the previous commit on JakartaMultiPartRequest and that
> also did not allow the method, thought I tested this
ok. If you can post the fix I can test it.
btw, I tried the previous commit on JakartaMultiPartRequest and that
also did not allow the method, thought I tested this on 7.0.0.🙁
On 02/02/2025 11:04, Łukasz Lenart wrote:
niedz., 2 lut 2025 o 11:15 Greg Huber napisał(a):
I get this warning:
20
niedz., 2 lut 2025 o 11:15 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> I get this warning:
>
> 2025-02-02 10:06:49,238 WARN
> org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.multipart.JakartaMultiPartRequest
> JakartaMultiPartRequest:processNormalFormField - Form field
> [action:myFiles!upload] is rejected!
>
> 2025-02-02 10:07:31,
I get this warning:
2025-02-02 10:06:49,238 WARN
org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.multipart.JakartaMultiPartRequest
JakartaMultiPartRequest:processNormalFormField - Form field
[action:myFiles!upload] is rejected!
2025-02-02 10:07:31,275 WARN
org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.multipart.JakartaMulti
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only
non-breaking changes.
Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated.
Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
Hello,
This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking changes.
Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated.
Please report any problems you will spot.
Here are the changes from the previous version:
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag
I agree, you are right.
> Lukasz Lenart hat am 29.01.2025 10:13 CET
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Same here, Tomcat 11 is unstable and trying to build Struts to support
> Jakarta 11 also produces some errors. I would wait on stable Jakarta
> 11 first.
>
> pon., 27 st
Same here, Tomcat 11 is unstable and trying to build Struts to support
Jakarta 11 also produces some errors. I would wait on stable Jakarta
11 first.
pon., 27 sty 2025 o 08:40 Kusal Kithul-Godage
napisał(a):
>
> Unless you've got a fix ready, I'd argue WW-5496 is not required f
olved. See my comments.
>
> Günter
>
> > Lukasz Lenart hat am 26.01.2025 08:23 CET
> > geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > I'm going to prepare a first patch version of Struts 7, do you miss
> > anything?
> > https://issu
Hi Lukas,
for me WW-5496 is open and WW-5495 is not solved. See my comments.
Günter
> Lukasz Lenart hat am 26.01.2025 08:23 CET
> geschrieben:
>
>
> I'm going to prepare a first patch version of Struts 7, do you miss anything?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projec
All good by me for both 6.7.1 and 7.0.1
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 6:23 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> I'm going to prepare a first patch version of Struts 7, do you miss anything?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12355521
>
&g
I'm going to prepare a first patch version of Struts 7, do you miss anything?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12355521
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For addit
I'm going to prepare a new version of Struts 6.x, any objections or do
you miss something to be fixed?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12355301
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
Hi,
Please ask such questions on the User Mailing list, the Dev list is
intended to support development of the framework.
https://struts.apache.org/mail.html
I made a simple example using struts-examples (where the ${} is used
in a few places) and it works, I would check if "session.list&qu
Hi,
We are migrating our application from struts2-core 2.5.33 to 6.7.0.
Post migration, we are facing issues while populating bean values in
session.
${} is printing null values. Seems the EL is not working post 6.x migration.
Can you help me to understand if I'm missing something in this migra
but it's not necessary.
I use a JBoss EAP 8 for deployment of the war file but I am pretty sure
that this doesn't matter either.
Starting up of the application server is fine but on visiting
http://localhost:8080/struts-example the error occurs (Error loading
class [org.apach
ou want me to try
> something out, just let me know.
I wonder if this isn't related to allowlist functionality related
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+6.x.x+to+7.x.x+migration#Struts6.x.xto7.x.xmigration-OGNLallowlistcapability
Could you try to define struts
On 15.01.25 08:25, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
I assume you jar
contains only Convention based actions?
Yes, they are all Convention based actions.
Sorry, I didn't had the time to do more testing. If you want me to try
something out, just let me know.
Regards, Florian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
niedz., 29 gru 2024 o 10:48 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a):
> I tried it with the struts-example and I could reproduce the behaviour
> when I add the constant:
> value=".*?/myjar.*?jar(!/)?" />
>
> Can you confirm? In my real application I need action loading from an
move from 2.5 to 6.7 due to the
> file upload path traversal vulnerability.
>
> I didn't find a new account page on the Apache Confluence to request an
> account or I'd be happy to do it myself.
>
> Our finding was that Struts OGNL expressions gained an imposed default
I didn't find a new account page on the Apache Confluence to request an account
or I'd be happy to do it myself.
Our finding was that Struts OGNL expressions gained an imposed default maximum
length of 256 characters at some point between 2.5 -> 6, and in order to avoid
broken functi
Done
pon., 6 sty 2025 o 11:38 Sebastian Peters
napisał(a):
>
> Hello Lukasz,
>
> Could you remove the "Pre-release" label from the release page?
> https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_6_7_0
&
Hello Lukasz,
Could you remove the "Pre-release" label from the release page?
https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_6_7_0
Thank you!
Sebastian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apac
basePackage" I don't
"org.apache.struts2.XWorkTestCase" to be used in scan. Can you share
your config?
[1]https://struts.apache.org/plugins/convention/#configuration-reference
[2]https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/main/annotations
I tried it with the struts-example and
1 - 100 of 19960 matches
Mail list logo
