On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 23:18, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > > That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as
> > > long as possible, and not diverg
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as
> > long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon,
> > simply because I don
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as
> long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon,
> simply because I don't think there is enough energy here to sustain
> two parallel version of Struts.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:40:38 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:38:26 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > At this point, I'm not sure we all agree on what would constitute a
> > part of v2 rather than v1, since I anticipate some fairly
> > substantial changes going in
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:38:26 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> At this point, I'm not sure we all agree on what would constitute a
> part of v2 rather than v1, since I anticipate some fairly
> substantial changes going into what some people have referred to as
> v1. I'd certainly not want to see us cre
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:25:06 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:22:27 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > Splitting out the database part of mailreader seems like an obvious
> > first step. How about a top level "examples" directory with a
> > "mailreader-data
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:22:27 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> Splitting out the database part of mailreader seems like an obvious
> first step. How about a top level "examples" directory with a
> "mailreader-database" subdirectory to contain this artifact? If
> the business logic turns out to b
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:29:20 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:06:44 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > ... Interestingly, this subproject has four subsubprojects ...
>
> Are you counting the MailReader database as a separate artifact?
I hadn't been, and that
I've taken advantage of the new capabilities that Subversion provides
for refactoring, to set up struts-faces as a top-level subproject with
the ability to create its own release artifact. Interestingly, this
subproject has four subsubprojects that provide its content as well,
so the top-level bui
