On 2/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of
Struts?
I'll rename them with underscores, for example:
On 2/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of
Struts?
So then the question is why Craig decided to switch from the original
convention that he started almost 6 years ago and everyone else followed.
;-) I'd really prefer that we all use the same scheme, otherwise we'll just
end up with a mess, and nobody will ever remember the name they're supposed
to
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of Struts?
I'll rename them with underscores, for example: STRUTS_ACTION_1_3_0. Okay?
(See also:
On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of
Struts?
I'll rename them with underscores, for example:
STRUTS_ACTION_1_3_0. Okay?
+1 from me. If this is done, could
