[jira] Closed: (STR-2438) Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work

2006-04-24 Thread David Evans (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2438?page=all ] David Evans closed STR-2438: > Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work > -- > > Key: STR-2438 > URL: http

[jira] Resolved: (STR-2438) Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work

2006-04-24 Thread David Evans (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2438?page=all ] David Evans resolved STR-2438: -- Resolution: Fixed > Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work > -- > > Key: STR-24

[jira] Reopened: (STR-2438) Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work

2006-04-24 Thread David Evans (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2438?page=all ] David Evans reopened STR-2438: -- Assign To: David Evans (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34606] - Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work

2005-12-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Validator Plugin and validator-rules.xml

2005-11-12 Thread Laurie Harper
lidator-rules.xml in struts-core.jar. Then you can *optionally* use it when you configure the Validator Plugin: value="/org/apache/struts/validator/validator-rules.xml, /WEB-INF/validation.xml" /> Or you can ext

Validator Plugin and validator-rules.xml

2005-11-12 Thread Wendy Smoak
ruts-core.jar. Then you can *optionally* use it when you configure the Validator Plugin: Or you can extract it from the jar (or continue using your existing version of it) and configure the plugin "as usual" with "/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml". However, I thi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34606] - Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work

2005-04-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34606] New: - Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work

2005-04-25 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34606 Summary: Validator plugin with DefaultForm doesn't work Product: Struts Version: Unknown Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component

Re: [validator-plugin] MASK_VALIDATOR

2004-06-01 Thread David Graham
--- Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > what is the reason, the mask need to start with "^" > and end with "$" ? Because Commons Validator uses ORO as the regex engine. I believe when we move to standard Java 1.4 regexs you won't need the ^ and $. David > > --> >

Re: [validator-plugin] MASK_VALIDATOR

2004-06-01 Thread Alvin Townsend Jr.
tring length > 0, it must have a-z or A-Z somewhere in it. My $.02, Alvin > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2004 09:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [validator-plugin] MASK_VALIDATOR > > Hi t

[validator-plugin] MASK_VALIDATOR

2004-06-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi there, what is the reason, the mask need to start with "^" and end with "$" ? --> mask ^[a-zA-Z]*$ possible to turn off? Cheers, -- Matthias Weßendorf Aechterhoek 18 D-48282 Emsdetten Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net URL: http://www.wessendorf.net ---

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-06 Thread Matt Bathje
- Original Message - From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:52 AM Subject: Re: Validator Plugin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Quoting Robert L

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-06 Thread Martin Cooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Quoting Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > >One issue with this is to make sure the validator DTD is up to date. > > > > > >The reason I say this is because the DTD appears to be missing the

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-06 Thread mpb
Quoting Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >One issue with this is to make sure the validator DTD is up to date. > > > >The reason I say this is because the DTD appears to be missing the > var-jstype > >sub-element of the var element. Even the 1.2.0 version of

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-05 Thread Robert Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One issue with this is to make sure the validator DTD is up to date. The reason I say this is because the DTD appears to be missing the var-jstype sub-element of the var element. Even the 1.2.0 version of the DTD on CVS is missing this. I assume it is a valid element,

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-05 Thread Robert Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One issue with this is to make sure the validator DTD is up to date. The reason I say this is because the DTD appears to be missing the var-jstype sub-element of the var element. Even the 1.2.0 version of the DTD on CVS is missing this. I assume it is a valid element,

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-05 Thread mpb
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > David Graham wrote: > > >--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Currently the Validator PlugIn doesnâEUR^(TM)t validate the XML file. I > have > >>

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
David Graham wrote: --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently the Validator PlugIn doesnâEUR^(TM)t validate the XML file. I have updated it to remove the deprecated methods and to validate the XML files. Here is the question: Currently, the validator plugin fails by log

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I agree that we should throw the exception. IMO, it should fail fast and > > loud at startup if you've misconfigured the validations. > > I know this change has been checked in already, but wanted to add my +1 > any

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-02 Thread Martin Cooper
Wow. I don't know what happened to my previous message. What showed up wasn't anything like what I sent, so I'm sending again (using a different mail client). See below. On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, David Graham wrote: > > --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &g

RE: Validator Plugin

2004-04-02 Thread Martin Cooper
> -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:39 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Validator Plugin > > > > --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-02 Thread James Mitchell
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, David Graham wrote: > > --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Currently the Validator PlugIn doesn’t validate the XML file. I have > > updated it to remove the deprecated methods and to validate the XML > > files. > > >

Re: Validator Plugin

2004-04-02 Thread David Graham
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently the Validator PlugIn doesn’t validate the XML file. I have > updated it to remove the deprecated methods and to validate the XML > files. > > Here is the question: Currently, the validator plugin fails by logging a

Validator Plugin

2004-04-01 Thread Robert Leland
Currently the Validator PlugIn doesnât validate the XML file. I have updated it to remove the deprecated methods and to validate the XML files. Here is the question: Currently, the validator plugin fails by logging a message but doesnât take advantage of throwing an exception. I believe it