AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:30:20 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:0
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:30:20 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:05:10 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote:
> >
> > What I do think we've been doing wrong is rushing to vote on a
> > release right after it is cut. As I noted before, from the
> > framework we've laid out, I
ready use it.
-Ted.
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)
On Mon,
ruts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:05:10 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote:
What I do think we've been doing wrong is rushing to vote on a
releas
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:05:10 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote:
>
> What I do think we've been doing wrong is rushing to vote on a
> release right after it is cut. As I noted before, from the
> framework we've laid out, I would consider it totally normal for us
> to change (upward) the status of a release
