Iirc that's where I'd like a little pluggability, too; I'm not convinced
the default non-whitespace-trimming converters are the best idea. Gotta
revisit some code I did for that.
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012, Łukasz Lenart
wrote:
> I've started looking into those two classes and it looks like
> X
I've started looking into those two classes and it looks like
XWorkConverter is more a converter manager but extends
DefaultTypeConverter (which implements TypeConverter) and mostly
trying to find out a converter to use or delegates work to
DefaultTypeConverter or to XWorkBasicConverter.
I think i
2012/3/6 Dave Newton :
> I wondered the same thing; there's a bunch of XW stuff that could be
> merged/deprecated/etc.
Ok, will try to merge
Regards
--
Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/
mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
--
I wondered the same thing; there's a bunch of XW stuff that could be
merged/deprecated/etc.
2012/3/6 Łukasz Lenart
> Hi,
>
> Why two different converters in the same package ? Can both be merged
> in one class ?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> mobile +48 606 323 122, offi
Hi,
Why two different converters in the same package ? Can both be merged
in one class ?
Regards
--
Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/
mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
--
