Cool, I would wait till the end of week or maybe even till the end of
the month to see if there any other doubts and then we can go ahead
and merge the PR.
pon., 14 sty 2019 o 19:33 Yasser Zamani napisał(a):
>
>
>
> On 1/13/2019 4:14 PM, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
> >> If we are fine with suppor
On 1/13/2019 4:14 PM, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
>> If we are fine with supporting 2.5.x branch for a bit longer than a
> year
>
> I'm fine with that.
Me too. Security and bug fixes don't look like a burden for me even for
several years. And I found Struts, mature, so any structural breaking
h
@Nathan
> We are in the middle of a 2.3 -> 2.5 conversion now, would hate to do
it again.
Can you elaborate on why it was difficult to migrate (if it was :) )?
Have you followed migration guide [1]? It is pretty straightforward.
As for the java version I would suggest using java 8, 2.5.x runs
yes, we should only consider support for
security vulnerabilities and highly demanded features.
If we are fine with supporting 2.5.x branch for a bit longer than a
year, I'm good with switching to JDK8 in 2.6.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606
espite the java version, I personally experienced it too
hard, buggy and boring to manipulate and then support both branches (2.5 and
2.6) for new features.
Regards.
>-Original Message-
>From: Nathan Bragg
>Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 7:05 PM
>To: dev@struts.apache.org
>
Only if support for 2.5 lasts for awhile longer. We are in the middle of a 2.3
-> 2.5 conversion now, would hate to do it again.
On 2019/01/11 20:35:42, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about >
> upgrading to jdk8 in
Only if support for 2.5 lasts for awhile longer. We are in the middle of a 2.3
-> 2.5 conversion now, would hate to do it again.
On 2019/01/11 20:35:42, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about >
> upgrading to jdk8 in
> having to write a single line of multithread code.>
> www.oracle.com>
>
>
> +1>
> Martin>
> >
> From: i...@flyingfischer.ch >
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 4:23 AM>
> To: dev@struts.apache.org>
> Subject: Re:
, 2019 at 9:16 AM Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> pt., 11 sty 2019 o 21:36 Aleksandr Mashchenko
> napisał(a):
> >
> > We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about
> > upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?
> >
> > - Java versions are now released more fre
pt., 11 sty 2019 o 21:36 Aleksandr Mashchenko
napisał(a):
>
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about
> upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?
>
> - Java versions are now released more frequently
> - 2.5.x will still be on jdk7
> - Currently custom conve
Furthermore, streams can leverage multi-core architectures without you having
to write a single line of multithread code.
www.oracle.com
+1
Martin
From: i...@flyingfischer.ch
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 4:23 AM
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: jdk8 in 2.6
+1
Markus
Am 11.01.19 um 21:35 schrieb Aleksandr Mashchenko:
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about
> upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?
>
> - Java versions are now released more frequently
> - 2.5.x will still be on jdk7
> - Currently custom
++1
Kind Regards.
>-Original Message-
>From: Aleksandr Mashchenko
>Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 12:06 AM
>To: dev@struts.apache.org
>Subject: jdk8 in 2.6
>
>We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about upgrading to
>jdk8 in 2.6 version?
&g
We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about
upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?
- Java versions are now released more frequently
- 2.5.x will still be on jdk7
- Currently custom converters must be created to use java 8 date/time
classes
- Currently date tag is useless with
14 matches
Mail list logo
