Re: svn commit: r947374 - /struts/maven/trunk/build/KEYS

2010-05-25 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/5/23 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com: 2010/5/23 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org: If an existing key has ever been used to sign a release, it should not be removed from the KEYS file. It's still

Re: svn commit: r947374 - /struts/maven/trunk/build/KEYS

2010-05-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2010/5/23 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com: 2010/5/23 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org: If an existing key has ever been used to sign a release, it should not be removed from the KEYS file. It's still needed to verify those older releases. New keys should just be added without

Re: svn commit: r947374 - /struts/maven/trunk/build/KEYS

2010-05-23 Thread Martin Cooper
If an existing key has ever been used to sign a release, it should not be removed from the KEYS file. It's still needed to verify those older releases. New keys should just be added without removing anything that was there before. -- Martin Cooper 2010/5/23 lukaszlen...@apache.org: Author:

Re: svn commit: r947374 - /struts/maven/trunk/build/KEYS

2010-05-23 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2010/5/23 Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org: If an existing key has ever been used to sign a release, it should not be removed from the KEYS file. It's still needed to verify those older releases. New keys should just be added without removing anything that was there before. I didn't know, I