DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26322] - WebLogic hot-deploy breaks Tiles; TilesRequestProcessor is not serializable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release?

Ted, are there any plans to move the validWhen-Validator to "core"-validator(commons), AFTER you rolled out validator1.3.1 AND struts1.2.1 ? Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 2:30 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Sub

Re: Validator/Struts bugs

[Moving from off-list] Thanks, Don. I took this morning "off" to get the the Commons Validator 1.1.3 rolled. Of course, as soon as the updated dependencies hit the street, we can plug those in and roll 1.1.4. I pinged the Jakarta PMC list about karma for you and Niall, so you should be able to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29443] New: - html tags need bundle attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29017] - Added support for enforcing min or max numeric values

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20535] - Dynamically size arrays to allow array types in request scope DynaActionForm forms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs)

The Commons Validator tickets and docs are up-to-date now. The next couple of days are busy, but I can try to roll Validator 1.1.3 on Thursday, and then we could roll Struts 1.2.1 on Friday, if we can get the tickets squashed. -Ted.

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs)

Ted, I'd like to get the Struts-Faces build working again (bug #: 28668) for this build. Basically all that needs to happen is the patches attached to bug #: 22207 need to be applied. Does Niall have commit privileges at this point? If not I'd like to commit the patch so that we can get the code

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs)

I don't remember the version number that commons-validator moved the ValidatorUtil into util.ValidatorUtils, but i believe it was 1.1.3. If this is the case and you want to get struts-faces back up...then you will also need to apply the patch associated with this bug. http://issues.apache.org/

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces README.txt

jholmes 2004/06/08 12:44:06 Modified:contrib/struts-faces README.txt Log: fixed typo Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/README.txt Index: README.txt === RCS

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib JavascriptValidatorTag.java

jholmes 2004/06/08 12:59:38 Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib JavascriptValidatorTag.java Log: applied patch in bug 29219 by Michael Rasmussen to work with latest Commons Validator code. Revision ChangesPath 1.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29219] - JavascriptValidatorTag.java uses different version of commons-validator than struts nightly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs)

Got it. Thanks for the heads up. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs) I don't remember the version number that common

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces README.txt

jholmes 2004/06/08 13:02:47 Modified:contrib/struts-faces README.txt Log: Fixed another typo. Thanks Wendy! Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/README.txt Index: README.txt =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

I have some patches tha I can send later tonight that will correct the deprication warnings. They are all Struts deprication warnings From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightl

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: ForwardingWithDifferentParameter

Date: 2004-06-08T13:23:52 Editor: 148.87.1.171 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: ForwardingWithDifferentParameter URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ForwardingWithDifferentParameter no comment Change Log: -

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: ForwardingWithDifferentParameter

Date: 2004-06-08T13:24:51 Editor: 148.87.1.171 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: ForwardingWithDifferentParameter URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ForwardingWithDifferentParameter no comment Change Log: -

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

Cool, send them on and I will get them applied. Thanks, -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty I have some patches th

Building Struts with Maven

Does Maven completely build all of Struts from CVS? I just run `maven jar' and `maven war', but I do not see building of the web app examples or the tiles documentation war. What gives? -- Peter Pilgrim __ _ _ _ / //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java /

Re: Building Struts with Maven

At 10:34 PM +0100 6/8/04, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: Does Maven completely build all of Struts from CVS? I just run `maven jar' and `maven war', but I do not see building of the web app examples or the tiles documentation war. What gives? maven jar should just build struts-1.2.x.jar I'm not sure what

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs volunteers.xml

niallp 2004/06/08 15:32:18 Modified:xdocsvolunteers.xml Log: Add myself to committers Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +4 -0 jakarta-struts/xdocs/volunteers.xml Index: volunteers.xml === RCS

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs volunteers.xml

At 10:32 PM + 6/8/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: niallp 2004/06/08 15:32:18 Modified:xdocsvolunteers.xml Log: Add myself to committers Whoo-hoo! Welcome Niall, the newest Struts committer. Gee, that took a long time to get the officialities straightened out. Now that you're

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs volunteers.xml

Thanks. Partly my fault I've been away for a week. I had to look up hazing, fortunately seems to be an American practice and I'm hoping a whole load of Atlantic will protect me from most of what I read :-) Niall - Original Message - From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalog

Date: 2004-06-08T16:34:23 Editor: 213.137.125.226 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalog URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalog Missing link added Change Log: -- @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ *

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] New: - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Fixing Deprication Errors (Formerly RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty)

Created a new issue and attached the patch! The patches are in one file. Let me know if I should change this. Michael -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 4:25 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2866

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF

Date: 2004-06-08T16:43:50 Editor: 213.137.125.226 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF no comment Change Log:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF

Date: 2004-06-08T16:47:39 Editor: 213.137.125.226 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogHidingPagesUnderWEBINF no comment Change Log:

Re: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs)

I have committ privledge so I am going to apply the patch. Niall - Original Message - From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 7:48 PM Subject: RE: Struts 1.2.1 release plan (was Re: Validator/Struts bugs) >

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionFormClass.java ActionServlet.java

niallp 2004/06/08 17:25:15 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionFormClass.java ActionServlet.java Log: Changes for bug 28668/22207 Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +10 -60 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/DynaAc

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormBeanConfig.java

niallp 2004/06/08 17:25:34 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormBeanConfig.java Log: Changes for bug 28668/22207 Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +72 -4 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/FormBeanConfig.java Index: FormBeanConfig.java

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java

niallp 2004/06/08 17:25:52 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java Log: Changes for bug 28668/22207 Revision ChangesPath 1.150 +22 -42 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/RequestUtils.java Index: RequestUtils.java ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/action TestDynaActionFormClass.java

niallp 2004/06/08 17:26:49 Modified:src/test/org/apache/struts/action TestDynaActionFormClass.java Log: Changes for bug 28668/22207 Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +4 -6 jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/action/TestDynaActionFormClass

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/component FormComponent.java

niallp 2004/06/08 17:27:14 Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/component FormComponent.java Log: Changes for bug 28668/22207 Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22207] - serialization and deserialization

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

Yes, we will need to check this in the morning because I'm not convinced that closing 22207 will fix the nightly struts-faces issue. I say this because I was able to get struts-faces to build fine today without the 22207 fixed being applied. We'll see... Thanks for taking care of 22207 and welco

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

"James Holmes" wrote... > Yes, we will need to check this in the morning because I'm not convinced > that closing 22207 will fix the nightly struts-faces issue. I say this > because I was able to get struts-faces to build fine today without the 22207 > fixed being applied. > > We'll see... But

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormPropertyConfig.java

niallp 2004/06/08 17:54:24 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormPropertyConfig.java Log: Fix for bug 29284 Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +16 -10 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/FormPropertyConfig.java Index: FormPropertyConfig.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29284] - FormPropertyConfig shouldn't try to initialize primitive arrays

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

What did you just patch then? 1.1 or 1.2? Will 1.2 now use the (formBeanConfig, ModuleConfig) or (formBeanConfig)? -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:52 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28983] - Unimplemented Servlet 2.3 methods in MultipartRequestWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

You're right. My bad. I didn't realize that you're patches had changes to the struts-faces code until I just looked at the commits. The struts-faces code does indeed compile against struts 1.1. Ok, now I need to go and double check that the changes I commited to struts-faces today do not break

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17583] - Handling parameters from MultipartRequestWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

He patched the 1.2 code, but that's where struts-faces is built from since struts-faces came after the 1.1 release if I recall. Everything should work ok. I am double checking now... -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 200

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

Actually it was good. Until your thread I'd assumed struts-faces was failing against the the current source. You saying it complied made me go look at the source and old messages to try and understand what was going on.and the patch I originally posted to bugzilla didn't include changing struts

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

The current source (1.2.x) has now reverted back to the original method signature: DynaActionFormClass.createDynaActionFormClass(FormBeanConfig) Niall - Original Message - From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, J

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

James I had an email conversation with Joe Germuska and he was of the opinion that there is no need to make faces compile to 1.1. It should always target the latest build of struts. The reasoning was that it is not widely used and is not a production ready piece anyway...so why hinder it with d

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

I'm glad you brought that up. I just went back through the struts-dev messages and saw that thread from last week. I disagree with the assertion that struts-faces shouldn't have to compile against 1.1. Most companies are using 1.1 and will need to have a version that compiles/works against it.

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

Well, it looks like my patches for 29219 will break the nightly build so I am reverting them. -James -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:29 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nig

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib JavascriptValidatorTag.java

jholmes 2004/06/08 19:08:10 Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib JavascriptValidatorTag.java Log: Reverted changes made for 29219 so that the nightly build (which compiles against 1.1) will work. Revision ChangesPath

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

So what does that mean for using struts-faces? If struts requires 2.2 and struts-faces needs 2.3? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

Actually that is a silly question. -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:15 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1 So what does that mean for using struts

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

Struts does not require 2.2 it WILL RUN on 2.2. You can run it on 2.3. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:18 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/util MessagesMap.java

jholmes 2004/06/08 19:28:28 Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/application ActionListenerImpl.java FacesRequestProcessor.java FacesTilesRequestProcessor.java contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apach

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

James, I just read through the Roadmap for Struts. There is mention of support for faces in 2.x but not before. Because of that it seems to me that you would always want faces to compile against the latest struts as "bringing it up to date" could prove hard if the codebase is already outdated an

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

I don't disagree that struts-faces should stay up to date with the latest code. Right now, however, if we do that, the nightly builds for struts-faces will continue to be broken. That is a bad thing. I think we need to discuss a more formal strategy for what should happen with struts-faces. Str

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

Well I think they will only fail if the dependency is on struts 1.1. If it moves to the 1.2 jar it will build won't it? -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:36 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which ver

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/renderer ErrorsRenderer.java

jholmes 2004/06/08 19:38:12 Modified:contrib/struts-faces/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/renderer ErrorsRenderer.java Log: Updated to use ActionMessage instead of the now deprecated ActionError. This is from the patch in bug 29448. Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29448] - Struts-faces dependent on struts 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

This is from the faces build file. Why making changes to faces that reflect 1.2 will break the build I think that changing this will fix all the build problems for faces -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:36 PM To: 'Str

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

Agreed, that will probably fix the nightly build issue, but I don't want to leave Struts 1.1 users out in the dark. The reality is that most people using Struts are at companies who don't allow them to use nightly builds of Struts. I think we can solve this by tagging/branching. -James -Ori

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

Fair enough. What type of branch would you suggest implementing? The only place I know of that a change HAS to break the build is in FormComponent.java. The others can stay deprecated and still build. When would the deprecated methods in 1.1 be dropped? 2.0? or earlier? -Original Message-

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

Good question. Depending on how long you've been paying attention to Struts and the dev list in particular, you may know that things tend to move pretty slow in the Struts development/release cycle world. Mostly this is because the committers (I'm very guilty) stay extremely busy and have limited

Re: struts-faces - which version of Struts

I thought the change I made to FormComponent and DynaActionFormClass means that the backward compatibility issue should have now gone. Niall - Original Message - From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 200

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsAndMaven

Date: 2004-06-08T20:36:59 Editor: PeterPilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsAndMaven URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAndMaven no comment Change Log: -- @@ -50,3 +50,

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsAndMaven

Date: 2004-06-08T20:38:20 Editor: PeterPilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsAndMaven URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAndMaven no comment Change Log: -- @@ -66,7 +66,

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

Niall, It appears this is true. However there is a problem with the validator dependencies for Struts. I got confused earlier about the original problem. Struts 1.1 uses commons-valiodator 1.1.2 and earlier I think(not really sure)... around about 1.1.3 there was a public API change (see bug #292

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

James, Maybe some feedback should be collected from the users list. Are you using Struts-faces in production now? If so what version of Struts are you using it with? If not does Struts-Faces fit into your company's plans in the next 12 months? Michael -Original Message- From:

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

> -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:52 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty > > > "James Holmes" wrote... > > > > Yes, we will need to check this in th

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs volunteers.xml

> -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 4:24 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs volunteers.xml > > > Thanks. Partly my fault I've been away for a week. > > I had to look up hazing, f

Re: Struts 1.2.1 release?

the major worry for craig was the potential incompatibility with new tomcat releases. since the community seems pretty keen on cutting validator and struts releases whose dependencies which might not work properly in the near future, so i suppose that i've done what i can and you can't say i h

saveErrors and saveMessages implementation question.

Hello, I am using the template design pattern (abstract superclass which extends action and declares a myExecute method which will be called in the execute method of the Abstract class) In the superclass I have a local variable errors which in the finally clause will be saved, irrespective of what