svn commit: rev 55676 - struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/src/java/org/apache/shale/impl

Author: craigmcc Date: Wed Oct 27 00:51:14 2004 New Revision: 55676 Added: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/src/java/org/apache/shale/impl/ImplApplicationFilter.java Modified: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/src/java/org/apache/shale/impl/ImplPhaseListener.java Log: Add the beginnings o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: rev 55687 - struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale

Author: husted Date: Wed Oct 27 05:02:02 2004 New Revision: 55687 Added: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/build.properties.sample struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/project.properties struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/project.xml Modified: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/build.xml Lo

[Shale] Day Two

Yesterday, as advertised, the Shale API built without any external dependencies (whatsoever). Today, the new implementations require dependencies on Servlet 2.4, JSF, and Commons Logging. But, I can't get it to build because "org.apache.shale.impl.ImplApplicationFilter is not abstract and does

svn commit: rev 55697 - struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions

Author: husted Date: Wed Oct 27 07:06:07 2004 New Revision: 55697 Modified: struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/LocaleAction.java Log: Minor refactoring. Modified: struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/LocaleAction.java ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21624] - Extend TokenProcessor to handle a list of transaction tokens

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: rev 55700 - struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale

Author: germuska Date: Wed Oct 27 07:43:03 2004 New Revision: 55700 Modified: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/project.properties Log: fix expression of value for 'maven.repo.remote' -- why don't any of the repos have servlet-2.4? Modified: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/project.propertie

Re: [Shale] Day Two

Ted Husted wrote: Yesterday, as advertised, the Shale API built without any external dependencies (whatsoever). Today, the new implementations require dependencies on Servlet 2.4, JSF, and Commons Logging. Hello Craig and Ted: Please continue to post up-to-date Shale API. This is an exciting

Re: Maven4Shale [was svn commit: rev 55700 - struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale]

> why don't any of the repos have servlet-2.4? ibiblio seems to have it, but it has a timestamp in the name: * http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/servletapi/jars/ I'll ask BlueSunrise if they would carry 2.4, since they were they ones that had JSF. -Ted. On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:43:03 +, [EMAIL PR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: rev 55700 - struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale

FWIW, the Geronimo repository has a snapshot of Servlet 2.4: http://svn.apache.org/repository/geronimo-spec/jars/geronimo-spec-servlet-2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar Craig On 27 Oct 2004 14:43:03 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: germuska > Date: Wed Oct 27 07:43:03 2004 > New Rev

Re: [Shale] Day Two

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:07:09 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yesterday, as advertised, the Shale API built without any external dependencies > (whatsoever). > > Today, the new implementations require dependencies on Servlet 2.4, JSF, and Commons > Logging. > > But, I can't get it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31922] New: - Pluggable MultipartRequestWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[OT] servlet-api-2.4 on Maven repositories?

(I sent this before Craig and Ted's notes came back, but it seems to have gone into a black hole, so sending again, since i still have these questions...) This is a bit of a puzzle for me and after a bit of digging, I don't have a great place to pose this question -- so I'll keep it close to h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [OT] servlet-api-2.4 on Maven repositories?

Apache does indeed have Apache-licensed versions of the servet 2.4 (and JSP 2.0) API classes. The ones that are shipped with Tomcat 5.x are in cvs repository "jakarta-servletapi-5". I would imagine we could just get the Tomcat folks to post those JARs to ibiblio or something. Isn't that just a m

Re: [OT] servlet-api-2.4 on Maven repositories?

At 10:34 AM -0700 10/27/04, Craig McClanahan wrote: Apache does indeed have Apache-licensed versions of the servet 2.4 (and JSP 2.0) API classes. The ones that are shipped with Tomcat 5.x are in cvs repository "jakarta-servletapi-5". I would imagine we could just get the Tomcat folks to post thos

Re: [OT] servlet-api-2.4 on Maven repositories?

Vincent: Perhaps this is the correct way to do it; I started off using the "servlet API" versions, just because I saw them and that made sense. If anyone on the Tomcat team is interested in Maven, it may still make sense for them to also put them under servletapi with Sun's version numbers, for

Shale - Itch Proposal

Instead of taking the approach of predicting what developers might want from Struts and JSF in the future and providing a few potentially unrealistic and overly simplistic demos, how about identifying a complete evolutionary or revolutionary sample web application and/or web service that would be t

Re: Shale - Itch Proposal

One example use that I am doing based on the Struts-Chain example: SoA access (via Hessian and a chain dispatcher) to Apache JackRabit CMS. W SoA, you can call from any API (Tiles, Portlet, JSTL, JSP, Servlet... any Java. or non Java, like C++). It's just a call that happens to dispatch and e

Re: Shale - Itch Proposal

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT), Scott Anderson wrote: > Instead of taking the approach of predicting what developers might > want from Struts and JSF in the future You probably have little to worry about in this regard, Scott. :) Few, if any of us, are doing this for fun or profit. We d

Re: Shale - Itch Proposal

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT), Scott Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > With this in mind, my proposal for a useful and > demonstrative application would be the result of > porting/supporting NetBeans' web application > development APIs and relevant visual components to a > JSR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31731] - ClassCastException from ActionServlet.getRequestProcessor()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31931] New: - request wrapper class is not pluggable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31931] - request wrapper class is not pluggable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu