Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Al Sutton
Gets my vote. GXP will have had "real-world" thrashing and monitoring whereas as we've seen recently freemarkers scalability issues aren't always found and fixed that quickly. Al. Don Brown wrote: It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in many of its applications, but

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Al Sutton
P.S. If you want to know more about GXP there is a history available from http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-xml-pages-functional-markup.html Al Sutton wrote: Gets my vote. GXP will have had "real-world" thrashing and monitoring whereas as we've seen recently freemarkers scal

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Don Brown
Sure, this wouldn't go in till at least 2.2, but just wanted to see what others thought about it as solution to our tag problem. Don On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:37 PM, dusty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good to me, but is it just the latest and greatest? Should we wait a > bit and get som

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/7/26 Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in > many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML > Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source yesterday or so. There > is a lot to like in GXP like type safety, s

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Ted Husted
I like the idea. I wonder if GPX might also be a good way to phase in a new approach for Ajax-backed tags? -Ted. On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in > many of its applications, but for the view

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Musachy Barroso
Looks great. +1. If they are using it with Struts and/or XWork they have a GXP result already (hint hint to googleans: can we have it?). musachy On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the idea. > > I wonder if GPX might also be a good way to phase in a new

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Piero Sartini
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2008 16:01:08 schrieb Musachy Barroso: > Looks great. +1. If they are using it with Struts and/or XWork they > have a GXP result already (hint hint to googleans: can we have it?). Since there is no support for JSP tags in GXP, how could the struts2 tags be accessed in such an

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Dave Newton
--- On Sat, 7/26/08, Piero Sartini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since there is no support for JSP tags in GXP, how could > the struts2 tags be accessed in such an result? Er, I think the idea was to use GXP instead of FreeMarker for the S2 tags. Dave

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Bob Lee
I'll send the source for our gxp result on mon. On Jul 26, 2008 12:03 AM, "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source

Re: [s2] Google XML Pages (GXP) to replace Freemarker in tags?

2008-07-26 Thread Musachy Barroso
ahh..that's the spirit, thanks! musachy On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'll send the source for our gxp result on mon. > > On Jul 26, 2008 12:03 AM, "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts