copy_test, update crash and dirent_uri failure on Windows

2010-01-05 Thread Ed
Hi, It's been some time since I last compiled svn on my Windows box; but, as far as I can recall, I've had this problem before. I'm running VS2008 on a Vista machine and compiling the trunk (checked out today as of r896326. During the copy_tests (specifically #7), I would get a dialog which sta

Re: 1.6.7 up for signing/testing

2010-01-05 Thread Joe Swatosh
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >

Re: 1.6.7 up for signing/testing

2010-01-05 Thread Joe Swatosh
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: Please be sure to test the bindings. >>> >>> Also, a ruby

Re: 1.6.7 up for signing/testing

2010-01-05 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: Please be sure to test the bindings. >>> >>> Also, a ruby b

Re: 1.6.7 up for signing/testing

2010-01-05 Thread Paul Burba
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote: > On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >>> Please be sure to test the bindings. >> >> Also, a ruby bindings test segfaults. >> >> I've found this in an Open

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-05 Thread Mark Phippard
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote: >> This could be a nice way to break the copy-to problem down into smaller >> pieces, since it would allow us to implement copy-to information >> for renames in the client<->server interface before actually storing >

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-05 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Stefan Sperling wrote: > This could be a nice way to break the copy-to problem down into smaller > pieces, since it would allow us to implement copy-to information > for renames in the client<->server interface before actually storing > it in the repository. copy-to information is effectively stor

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:18:25PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Stefan Sperling] > > Subversion needs to amend its data model to provide copy-to > > information, to complement the current copy-from information. > [...] > > This is easier said than done. It implies repository format changes.

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-05 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Stefan Sperling] > Subversion needs to amend its data model to provide copy-to > information, to complement the current copy-from information. [...] > This is easier said than done. It implies repository format changes. > We'd need to a way to modify old revisions to store this information > beca

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Kylo Ginsberg wrote on Tue, 5 Jan 2010 at 08:28 -0800: > So one bug/enhancement here is to improve client reporting when it > encounters a 207. > > But back to the root of my original problem: I can create a "svn:" > property via the svn access method without any errors which then > results in err

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, 5 Jan 2010 at 00:32 -0500: > Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: > > Is svnserve really allowing you to create a random svn: junk property? > > I was pretty sure that servers validated svn: properties -- only a > > scant few exist, and users aren't supposed to be able to inve

Re: Move site/* to site/publish/*

2010-01-05 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > It's more than just a folder rename, since we have to reconfigure > stuff on the server. > > Hyrum: what kind of "related" stuff are you talking about? And why > would it then be in a folder called "site" when it isn't ON the site? I'm specificall

Re: Move site/* to site/publish/*

2010-01-05 Thread Greg Stein
It's more than just a folder rename, since we have to reconfigure stuff on the server. Hyrum: what kind of "related" stuff are you talking about? And why would it then be in a folder called "site" when it isn't ON the site? On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 13:56, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010

Re: Move site/* to site/publish/*

2010-01-05 Thread Mark Phippard
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > We recently moved all of our web content out of trunk and into it's own > top-level directory, > called site/.  I propose we move it once more to site/publish/.  This would > allow us to put > additional related-but-not-published material

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:28, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > So one bug/enhancement here is to improve client reporting when it > encounters a 207. > > But back to the root of my original problem: I can create a "svn:" > property via the svn access method without any errors which then > results in errors

RE: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Engebakken Geir
If someone is interested, this is what I found about cvs2svn problems generating this "207 Multi-status" return code. http://old.nabble.com/bug-with---auto-props:-PROPFIND-pf...:-207-Multi-Status-td18510529.html Geir -Original Message- From: Engebakken Geir [mailto:geir.engebak...@edb

RE: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Engebakken Geir
Right, but why doesn't the client handle this more "graciously", by examining the result and maybe point the user in a direction to find the cause of the "failure", instead of just spitting out "207 Multi-status"? In our case we get this message diffing two revisions of a file, but we don’t kn

Move site/* to site/publish/*

2010-01-05 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
We recently moved all of our web content out of trunk and into it's own top-level directory, called site/. I propose we move it once more to site/publish/. This would allow us to put additional related-but-not-published material in the site/ directory, and follows precedent in other Apache pro

RE: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Engebakken Geir
We have experienced the "207 Multi-status" error in subversion when diffing to revisions of a file. A search for a solution, and posting to the user list did not help us, so we still live with the problem that only has appeared for some files. It might have something to do with a SCM conversion

Re: [patch] comment Ruby Binding test and request uncomment when it should pass again

2010-01-05 Thread Gavin Baumanis
Thanks for the update Joe. Gavin. On 31/12/2009, at 17:00 , Joe Swatosh wrote: > Thanks Gavin, but this patch was made moot by philip fixing the > underlying problem in r891376. > > -- > Joe > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis > wrote: >> Ping. >> This Submission has r

Re: wc-ng locks and pool cleanup

2010-01-05 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Dec 21, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > In 1.6 wc locks were associated with access batons and when an access > baton was opened a pool cleanup handler was installed to ensure that > the baton was closed. The pool cleanup handler would remove any lock > associated with the access ba

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:45 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Kylo Ginsberg wrote: >> But back to the root of my original problem: I can create a "svn:" >> property via the svn access method without any errors which then >> results in errors when accessed via the http access method.  That >> seems li

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread C. Michael Pilato
[dropping users@ -- we're well into dev-land here.] Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > So one bug/enhancement here is to improve client reporting when it > encounters a 207. > > But back to the root of my original problem: I can create a "svn:" > property via the svn access method without any errors which th

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
So one bug/enhancement here is to improve client reporting when it encounters a 207. But back to the root of my original problem: I can create a "svn:" property via the svn access method without any errors which then results in errors when accessed via the http access method. That seems like a bu

Re: svn commit: r895794 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/props.c tests/cmdline/prop_tests.py

2010-01-05 Thread Paul Burba
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: pbu...@apache.org [mailto:pbu...@apache.org] >> Sent: maandag 4 januari 2010 22:39 >> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: svn commit: r895794 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: >> libsvn_wc/pro

Re: Shut down us...@s.t.o on Jan. 7.

2010-01-05 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 4, 2010, at 11:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> It's time to shut down us...@s.t.o. Most of the threads are now on >> us...@s.a.o, people are back from holiday, and we've already given plenty >> of notice that a shutdown was imminent. I propose we send mail to

Re: [PATCH]Typo fix and formatting changes

2010-01-05 Thread Julian Foad
On Wed, 2009-12-23, Kannan wrote: > Fix a typo and perform minor formatting tweaks. > > * notes/tree-conflicts/use-cases.txt > Add some clarity by including the 'Developer' info and a minor > formatting tweak. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c > (report_revisions_and_depths): s/treat

RE: [PATCH][v2] Sticky depths should work for an excluded dir

2010-01-05 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 5 januari 2010 14:38 > To: Kannan > Cc: SVN Dev > Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] Sticky depths should work for an excluded dir > > Kannan writes: > > > Make `--set-depth (empty|files|immediates) DI

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Sure. Ideally, the client would be able to say, "I had trouble parsing the XML in the response, namely this bit here: asdf" Wanna dive in and look into a patch? Engebakken Geir wrote: > Right, but why doesn't the client handle this more "graciously", by > examining the result and maybe point th

Re: [PATCH][v2] Sticky depths should work for an excluded dir

2010-01-05 Thread Philip Martin
Kannan writes: > Make `--set-depth (empty|files|immediates) DIR' work, where DIR's depth > had already been set as `exclude'. Only `infinity' works as of now. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/crop.c > (svn_wc_crop_tree2): Check the 'base status' of the node here and >remove the check done using `

Re: Shut down us...@s.t.o on Jan. 7.

2010-01-05 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Julian Foad wrote: > +1, no objections, but can we make sure that attempts to post to the old > address have a helpful reply? > > The other day I saw an automated reply to a post to d...@s.t.o, and it > just said, > > We are sorry, but email posting to this discussion is not allowed. I don't t

Re: svnsync "207 Multi-Status" failure with http access method and property "svn:"

2010-01-05 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Engebakken Geir wrote: > It seems to me that the 207 message is not an error message seen from > Apache, rather an informative message, but that SVN interprets it as an > error somehow. I would be glad to find out more about this "207 Multi-Status" isn't an error at all. It's a code fro

Re: Shut down us...@s.t.o on Jan. 7.

2010-01-05 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:08 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > It's time to shut down us...@s.t.o. Most of the threads are now on > us...@s.a.o, people are back from holiday, and we've already given > plenty of notice that a shutdown was imminent. I propose we send mail > to us...@s.t.o today, indic

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:02:07AM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote: > On 01/04/2010 02:32 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:45:07PM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote: > >> > >>If it doesn't resolve them (any? all?) yet, then this would explain > >>one of the results I saw and couldn't explai

RE: svn commit: r895794 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/props.c tests/cmdline/prop_tests.py

2010-01-05 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: pbu...@apache.org [mailto:pbu...@apache.org] > Sent: maandag 4 januari 2010 22:39 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r895794 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > libsvn_wc/props.c tests/cmdline/prop_tests.py > > Author: pburba > Date: