Re: [Fwd: Re: *** NOTICE: This mailing list is now CLOSED ***]

2010-01-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Ed wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> Subscribing is via: announce-subscr...@subversion.apache.org (woulda >> been nice to include instructions in your email) >> >> To *post* to annou...@s.a.o, you (apparently) need to use your >> @apache.org address, so it was immediately refusing his attempt to >> sub

Re: [Fwd: Re: *** NOTICE: This mailing list is now CLOSED ***]

2010-01-08 Thread Ed
Greg Stein wrote: Subscribing is via: announce-subscr...@subversion.apache.org (woulda been nice to include instructions in your email) To *post* to annou...@s.a.o, you (apparently) need to use your @apache.org address, so it was immediately refusing his attempt to subscribe. Is this applicabl

Re: A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > We need a website at subversion.apache.org. We've put up some > placeholder pages, and I recently started playing with an > Anakia-generated site in it's place. I've come across a few questions, > and they are thus: > > * What information should be presented? > * How sho

Re: A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-08 Thread Branko Čibej
Mark Phippard wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: > >> We need a website at subversion.apache.org. We've put up some placeholder >> pages, and I recently >> started playing with an Anakia-generated site in it's place. I've come >> across a few questions, and th

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-08 Thread Branko Čibej
Greg Hudson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:31 -0500, Paul Querna wrote: > >> "Profile everything, be faster at everything" >> > > There are smart people who will disagree with me on this, but I'm not > sure the best tool for improving Subversion performance is a profiler. > Historically

Re: Subversion Bug

2010-01-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
You have bumped into a known issue [1], which is fixed in svn 1.6.6. So upgrading to TortoiseSVN 1.6.6 should help. [1] http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3485 Regards, Johan On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Razmik Shahinian wrote: > in file > TortoiseSVN-1.6.3\ext\subversion\li

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-08 Thread Paul Querna
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Greg Hudson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:31 -0500, Paul Querna wrote: >> "Profile everything, be faster at everything" > > There are smart people who will disagree with me on this, but I'm not > sure the best tool for improving Subversion performance is a prof

Re: A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-08 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > We need a website at subversion.apache.org.  We've put up some placeholder > pages, and I recently > started playing with an Anakia-generated site in it's place.  I've come > across a few questions, and they > are thus: > >  * What informa

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-08 Thread Joe Schaefer
Warning: Paul Querna is a svn heretic. - Original Message > From: Paul Querna > To: Hyrum K. Wright > Cc: Subversion Dev > Sent: Fri, January 8, 2010 3:31:51 PM > Subject: Re: Subversion in 2010 > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: > > I hope the holidays ha

A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-08 Thread Hyrum K . Wright
We need a website at subversion.apache.org. We've put up some placeholder pages, and I recently started playing with an Anakia-generated site in it's place. I've come across a few questions, and they are thus: * What information should be presented? * How should we present the information?

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-08 Thread Greg Hudson
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:31 -0500, Paul Querna wrote: > "Profile everything, be faster at everything" There are smart people who will disagree with me on this, but I'm not sure the best tool for improving Subversion performance is a profiler. Historically a lot of our performance issues have come

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-08 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: >> I hope the holidays have been good for everybody in the Subversion >> community. In between spending some quality time with family, and eating >> more than I ought, I've done a bit th

Re: Subversion in 2010

2010-01-08 Thread Paul Querna
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > I hope the holidays have been good for everybody in the Subversion community. >  In between spending some quality time with family, and eating more than I > ought, I've done a bit thinking about Subversion in 2010, what I'd like to > see

ASF: what do we have left?

2010-01-08 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
It's been a few weeks, since we've talked about it, and as our report to the Incubator PMC is due sometime soon, I'd like to ask: what do we have left for graduation? I'm not trying to rush the process, just advance it. -Hyrum

Re: [Fwd: Re: *** NOTICE: This mailing list is now CLOSED ***]

2010-01-08 Thread Greg Stein
Subscribing is via: announce-subscr...@subversion.apache.org (woulda been nice to include instructions in your email) To *post* to annou...@s.a.o, you (apparently) need to use your @apache.org address, so it was immediately refusing his attempt to subscribe. Cheers, -g On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 14:

Subversion Bug

2010-01-08 Thread Razmik Shahinian
in file TortoiseSVN-1.6.3\ext\subversion\libsvn_ra_svn\marshal.c line 486: assertion failed(opt||cstr)

[Fwd: Re: *** NOTICE: This mailing list is now CLOSED ***]

2010-01-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Uh-ohs. -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand --- Begin Message --- Michael, Sending a 'subscribe' mail to results in: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the fol

Re: [PATCH] Make svn clients indicate their operation name to backend(right now only to DAV)

2010-01-08 Thread Kamesh Jayachandran
On 01/06/2010 09:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Philip Martin wrote: Kamesh Jayachandran writes: This patch is with respect to the original thread http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201001.mbox/browser This one I suppose: http://mail-archives.apache.

Re: 1.6.8 Status

2010-01-08 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:19:27AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> > As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the >> > release, and will re-roll as 1.

Re: 1.6.8 Status

2010-01-08 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:19:27AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >>> As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the >>> release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8.

Re: 1.6.8 Status

2010-01-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:19:27AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > > As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the > > release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8. The only blocker for rolling is the > > r896522, r89654

Re: 1.6.8 Status

2010-01-08 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the > release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8.  The only blocker for rolling is the > r896522, r896547 which addresses a regression found in the 1.6.7 tarball (and > uncovere

Re: 1.6.8 Status

2010-01-08 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the > release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8. The only blocker for rolling is the > r896522, r896547 which addresses a regression found in the 1.6.7 tarball (and > uncovered b

1.6.8 Status

2010-01-08 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8. The only blocker for rolling is the r896522, r896547 which addresses a regression found in the 1.6.7 tarball (and uncovered by the ruby bindings). As soon as this fix is backported, I'l

Re: suspected bug report or feature request - tagging a sparse directory

2010-01-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Stas Cherkassky wrote: > Julian, > > I don't want to remove parts of the tree from the repository. > What I want is, effectively, a way to independently mark separate > parts of the tree with the same tag. > (I tried to explain it in my example). I don't see how you

[PATCH] Augment the awful "200 OK" error message when can't connect to repository

2010-01-08 Thread Julian Foad
What happens if I accidentally specify a URL that's not a repository? (Recent trunk build, Neon.) > $ svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/ > svn: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.apache.org/repos': 200 OK > (https://svn.apache.org) This is a truly awful error message, appearing alone as it does. Go