On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Weyh m.w...@technisat.de wrote:
Hello,
Since I did not get any responses to my question on the users group and
this might be a bug I am reposting this to the dev user group.
I am looking forward to your answers.
Thanks,
Matthias
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 04:27:27PM -, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu May 6 16:27:27 2010
New Revision: 941793
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=941793view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_wc/util.c
(svn_wc__status2_from_3): Fix a pointer error, and one of the
All,
Apologies for the delayed response. Yes, my report was not about how the
files were created when deployed, but rather how they were created within a
working copy when an 'svn mv' was done. I probably wouldn't have considered
that it might be a bug if it weren't for the inconsistency: if
I've never been a fan of the PATCH issue type present in our tracker. While
the other issue types (TASK, DEFECT, ENHANCEMENT, FEATURE) tell you
something about the problem that needs a-fixin', PATCH tells you only that
someone has proposed some code change. But for what?
So in the ViewVC
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:39:05PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
I've never been a fan of the PATCH issue type present in our tracker. While
the other issue types (TASK, DEFECT, ENHANCEMENT, FEATURE) tell you
something about the problem that needs a-fixin', PATCH tells you only that
someone
hi,
when i try to build subversion-1.6.11 on solaris 9 the below error
occurs. how could one track that down?
/usr/jdk1.6.0_07/bin/javah -force -d subversion/bindings/javahl/
include -classpath subversion/bindings/javahl/classes:
org.tigris.subversion.javahl.PropertyData
6 matches
Mail list logo
